IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] final charter description

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Thu, 05 November 2015 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDEC1B3657 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:07:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKFnV60bgcUz for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:07:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3CC1B3645 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:07:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so2017502wme.0 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:07:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hxr_us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MLykxrXSp0IiPZtywL8zk27XOzm6nPdT8i2cLEpmhpw=; b=GgZbTQ0riPouRJVQ2PWnPo4ZDLHhtBmyblMv09PR50Ux+ue+664Bg7FO2GB8/hrNgq hc68JLjuhhLsHWXx3aFcEoJryqQpXyrBtOkwE1LF+psJOTceeq3bcVZbJ62JK7eXIiQB 30LERff4714PwD98O5P7hJR8CYbX15ghZ/JZa2/ah/9LAjyGbLillKEaUzT5tYDwHlOa YEoNk+duHc+xeHe5MnYcGepcQQyBAZJdPwDjKHr3hfa1r4dT/MoVqE+Wpvj4ADa+W7Cz mW7CqFUEetOCwmxjpLWPrxeEQy5NkC7j30jfaR2BQxKS4Pspw/l5Ghy0PnIax38yaLFv DKgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MLykxrXSp0IiPZtywL8zk27XOzm6nPdT8i2cLEpmhpw=; b=jZ9cQI4TivjxGM8VPtXu8kXCieCd/y44Yua8yCQIridReWfuQLmrzE+McIPj8mqY6O xumZE+oATDDzmXF6Ftb8YFT5xOdG2Gl6f30t5epp/2SCtd/Bf76klu6Uml+pQtb9HQ9r X1Lz/pEYVsR46fW5cuSAc27YARYhlJasAtfq/5aRUZXCfWG/3etsKdZJmqHrvgthI6oB v0sis95bbBUS5O2kiDh1/6UflikvydKqzopMvezo/Oz1BRSj8iNNv/U9p2LtgwXToRlO xArZGLBLCgntyFzKE1Wrhy3+ZCehdlyRgiRIUotcB0NYAVAaWbvqtZdrAF9g4E3scybJ DxAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm6T1b7xCjnIzw6gxX1g+OSf1TGQDKJ6JzLI5vNh8DRQGXXSgwCJNv3i6XxRmVGY+qTc2dO
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.88.129 with SMTP id m123mr344109wmb.76.1446689242751; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 18:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.91.134 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:07:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [133.93.86.12]
In-Reply-To: <563AB732.9050301@elistx.com>
References: <563AAC4F.6050907@elistx.com> <A4E1F844-9D5E-43CD-B886-F5CB94809768@viagenie.ca> <1E948341-BA56-498F-8AF9-6382856B8265@viagenie.ca> <563AB498.7050203@elistx.com> <C160E43F-F77B-4DAF-9041-E1E0914D8128@viagenie.ca> <563AB732.9050301@elistx.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:07:22 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRcmLo=Gkm8cQC5RTd6AZTu1EkB3QW5XtUg0EHLRzT4qpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/gvx47MNe_q67DOu7-h_PDf4JQXQ>
Cc: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] final charter description
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 02:07:25 -0000

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:56 AM, James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com> wrote:
>
>
> What do others think?

I'm the guilty party who put that last sentence in there. The intent
was to allow the working group to focus on the EPP work it had before
it and not let the new RDAP work side track that. It maybe that this
sentence has been overcome by events and doesn't need to be in the
charter any more. So I'm fine with removing it.

Inclusion of things that are DNR and RIR related but not EPP or RDAP
is probably not a bad idea. There are likely to be few of them, and if
any of one of them becomes burdensome then the IETF can simply spin
off another WG specifically for it.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email