Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Support for a "Claims Service" post the Claims Phase
Francisco Obispo <fobispo@uniregistry.com> Thu, 08 January 2015 17:41 UTC
Return-Path: <fobispo@uniregistry.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBAF1A8AEB
for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:41:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id HjOHiGSKwd16 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra1.uniregistry.com (zimbra1.uniregistry.com
[162.221.214.42])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBE91A7D83
for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:41:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra1.uniregistry.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by zimbra1.uniregistry.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FE6604DDE;
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 17:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zimbra1.uniregistry.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by zimbra1.uniregistry.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD68F60332E;
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 17:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dynamic-200.sna1.uniregistry.net
(wsip-98-189-40-200.oc.oc.cox.net [98.189.40.200])
by zimbra1.uniregistry.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF0C2604DA7;
Thu, 8 Jan 2015 17:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_694390E5-E57F-4007-B9E4-BC8B9C623692"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Francisco Obispo <fobispo@uniregistry.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0D41AB9.46E54%trung.tran@neustar.biz>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:41:43 -0800
Message-Id: <E0661713-A8AD-46DB-9B42-8AFD3001A8B6@uniregistry.com>
References: <D0D41AB9.46E54%trung.tran@neustar.biz>
To: "Tran, Trung" <Trung.Tran@neustar.biz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/ixARpNIUeyZQGEe7-nRNbuCD-es>
Cc: Jody Kolker <jkolker@godaddy.com>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>,
"Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>
Subject: Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Support for a "Claims
Service" post the Claims Phase
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>,
<mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>,
<mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:41:49 -0000
Francisco Obispo CTO - Registry Operations 2161 San Joaquin Hills Rd. Newport Beach, CA, 92660 off. +1.345.749.6284 fax. +1.345.746.6263 > On Jan 8, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Tran, Trung <Trung.Tran@neustar.biz> wrote: > > Thanks Jim for bringing this to the eppext. This will definitely help the post claims phase. > > With the wording changes, is there still a way to determine if there’s a trademark against the name regardless on whether or not the claims ack is needed in the create domain?
- [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Support fo… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Jody Kolker
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Tran, Trung
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Francisco Obispo
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Francisco Obispo
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Francisco Obispo
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Jody Kolker
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Tran, Trung
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Michael Holloway
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Michael Holloway
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Jothan Frakes
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Jothan Frakes
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Michael Holloway
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Michael Holloway
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Gould, James
- Re: [eppext] draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase Suppor… Michael Holloway