IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] rechartering

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455251B31F8 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id poEdKjdr71_i for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f98.google.com (mail-oi0-f98.google.com [209.85.218.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996691B321E for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiho132 with SMTP id o132so5336716oih.2 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:mime-version; bh=lnnyMg5o+wEJ//k0RFCtaPR7lY2IVbReLuRWmdhI0oc=; b=hJPyv9JwTV1miRSK5Vm+2lhSIN9w/bImpDzJUzoh0X5aWaQX+Kr+CaMzDJQ8sOOE8r LT5HVzfWzbISFjH4Mduiue/+DCytBWudystBKegpHwU9zmuP7HyTI0q+rCu4LmhRsnZJ qJPQD7ZOvY7wUvu5zV2n6qdqxdsO5Ar4y0Bj/79JnfXjrZfmLmRldrpM/cUAtMLjsqJC 2GZy7gaJ6I+41hRM7Wo9szuePz6Hu5OQF2z/PrMeq/6yfxDYTuPeyX5KLlLGazNLSTnr 1e+aNwd3NjgFaB3QOwAACngAe35KzbfCJlOzW8kMqW/6ugI4qRQCQ+EJo75g4fQpadp9 qDtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkB7Q6RPzZCffptVxp8ozg8+Heg4P+PdhFJhL7RF8gkLDxbhQfEE41brGyD6Y1K3cRv9N5ehjPl05bGDtY1lVC6f6h8Sw==
X-Received: by 10.55.43.224 with SMTP id r93mr42729947qkr.24.1438022805979; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 1sm5874103qkx.1.2015.07.27.11.46.45 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6RIkinK000553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:46:45 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:46:44 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] rechartering
Thread-Index: AQHQyJkPFHZ2BhIbnkKLXgSzziciwp3vp6Qw
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:46:44 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A04062D@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A04062DBRN1WNEXMBX01vc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/j2TNsmb0V_ibYiPRy_2ajRu-csg>
Subject: Re: [eppext] rechartering
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:47:38 -0000

From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Newton
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:21 PM
To: eppext@ietf.org
Subject: [eppext] rechartering

All,

I'd like to offer another idea for the rechartering of this working group. Instead of focusing exclusively on EPP extensions, would it be better if we rechartered to focus on protocol issues of Internet registries... more specifically EPP and RDAP.

Given that the constituencies for both have considerable overlap, and there is already at least one draft covering the mapping between EPP and RDAP and that there will likely be future drafts where the inputs of EPP and the outputs of RDAP are correlated, this seems like an easier way forward.

I spoke privately with Scott, Barry, and Pete (the AD behind the chartering of both EPPEXT and WEIRDS) just to see if I wasn't barking madd, and they each thought it makes sense.

What are your thoughts and comments about such an approach?

I’d like to consider it. It would help to come up with alternative charter text.

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email