Re: [eppext] Extension Registration Request: Registry Fee Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)

[Alexander Mayrhofer <[e-mail]>]

All,

> I have no issue with the extension itself. Given that this request refers to an
> existing Internet-Draft document, I believe it would be more appropriate for
> the document to include an IANA Considerations section that includes a
> request to register the extension if the document becomes an RFC. My
> recommendation to IANA would be to hold off on processing the request
> until the document is either submitted to and approved by the IESG or it is
> published outside the IETF process.

I do agree with Scott that the registration details should go into the IANA considerations section of the document, using the template from RFC7451. Basically, i also agree that the registration should be held off until publication, if the intended goal of the document is publication as an RFC. 

I understand the document describes one of the candidate extensions that could be adopted as WG items once EPPEXT recharters. My recommendation above is based on this assumption. However, i'm slightly concerned about the current level of progress of the rechartering / scope work, and hence i do also recommend that the author should consider restarting the registration request once the final direction for the publication path of the document  is clear.

Alex