Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

Ulrich,

It seems that there is an inconsistency  between the minutes and jabber chatting.

According to the jabber, 

rik.ribbers@jabber.sidn.nl:
	is the WG opposed to taken onboard Informational
4g6bdlv965tvtus6229@room413.conf.meetecho.com:
	hummmmm
rik.ribbers@jabber.sidn.nl:
	yes silence no loud hummmm

So, Discussion about adoption of informational documents

“Hum only for no objection” should be corrected to “Hum only for no, objection”.

Am I making sense here? 

Shall we review the milestone that contains documents that is still under discussion of adoption?

Di MA

ZDNS Ltd.

http://en.zdns.cn

> 在 2015年11月5日，17:09，Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se> 写道：
> 
> Please find my minutes below.
> Feedback is welcome!
> /Ulrich
> 
> 
> EPPEXT meeting at IETF94 Yokohama 2015-11-05 15:20-17:20
> 
> Scott Hollenbeck and Ning Kong as interim chair
> Both chairs Jim Galvin and Antoin Verschueren in remote participation
> 
> draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
> draft-eppext-tmch-smd
>   Both are through last call and AD Barry Leiba is currently reviewing, response expected in the coming weeks.
> 
> 
> draft-ietf-epppext-launchphase
>   Jim Gould updated the document and thinks it is ready for last call.
>   shepherd Ulrich Wisser
> 
> draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-func-spec-00
>   shepherd Ulrich Wisser
> 
> draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-02
> draft-gould-idn-table-02
> draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00
>   James Gould speaks on these drafts. idnmap needs even idntables as to specify possible table name values.
>   Several of the documents are expired. Renewal is requested or will be directly after the meeting.
>   Documents will become milestones in the new charter.
>   wilcox will be retracted or moved to epp-registry.
> 
> Jim Galvin presents a list of documents currently in work and will be milestones 
> for the new charter.
> 
> draft-gould-allocation-token
>   James Goulds speaks on the reasoning behind the extensions.
>   Opposition to use AuthInfo for this purpose
> 
> draft-gould-change-poll
>   James Gould speaks on the reasoning of the document.
>   Clients get updates on changes to objects through the poll queue.
>   
> draft-gould-epp-rdap-status-mapping
>   James Gould presents on the reasoning behind the draft.
>   Comments from the room about the question of standards track or informational
> 
> draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
> draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-ext
>   Ning Kong presents
>   Discussions about need for RDAP extension 
>   Registrar object suggested with support in the room
> 
> draft-gould-eppext-verificationcode
> draft-xie-eppext-nv-mapping
>   James Gould presents 
>   IPR disclosure
> 
> Discussion about adoption of informational documents
>   Hum only for no objection
> 
> Discussion about documents to include in working group
>   - not draft from Alexander Mayerhofer
>   - Jim proposes to divide docs in groups for the milestones
>   - opposition and support for nv-mapping document
>   - Hum, no objections to milestones
>   - charter presentation and discussions
>   - Several submissions to not broaden the scope of the group to all things ICANN
> 
> -- 
> Ulrich Wisser
> ulrich@wisser.se
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext