Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94

Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl> Thu, 05 November 2015 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F088B1AD072 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 04:12:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRb2-e9oREyc for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 04:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arn2-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1C11AD06C for <eppext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 04:12:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; d=sidn.nl; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-mailer:x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version; bh=Yv1H9wG8HKOJ2jnGOAyJGoOVEIY15bN4hJaqeAWXi6k=; b=wXCcHtfdFBEWAX6vS3cVZ3EN2mdvoTguTFPPiJamVgenv9JaweJeY4n6ffARH30VWoaKzZmP+1FDa0lKfMBurgcYe34RNhDchHWjFb53uPcRRLyx+86Mf5jj/RaEyiKe+MnZ/AYXGVywpSklrF3HfHAA5HHi2sg7o+/CMjwg3oDlxMRax9Z8oVPE9pJUPLRkR4MqkIwlcumU5wIoEnuOCwxNHOXJWwjuQEO95iE3qhf+Ek3KLpRGGXTpRIYPtLG7jZiU39WuKqFMBoxXTZ9dpcpPTS1FSwTTwO0KpzV0AcEzufaFpMaxGF3uuX9EfjC4IVqUEO/yqFUdi2ANBa0YzA==
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.178]) by arn2-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id tA5CCFYW007564-tA5CCFYY007564 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:12:15 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local (192.168.2.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:12:18 +0100
Received: from ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549]) by ka-mbx02.SIDN.local ([fe80::9855:369a:1ca4:6549%13]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:12:18 +0100
From: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
To: "xiejiagui@teleinfo.cn" <xiejiagui@teleinfo.cn>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
Thread-Index: AQHRF8M3SrZcheFRSEipy2G047HmYQ==
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 12:12:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CDF93078-FA84-48EB-8EC0-DAE733681C6E@sidn.nl>
References: <CAJ9-zoXEL_QMsGJ1ZkNr61VHqXRCFCR8o6_UHO7vZxRtV-ZL=w@mail.gmail.com> <0101FBC0-248F-4560-9364-F023B901A959@zdns.cn> <38638B99-20DF-40B3-B431-36ECFE27485F@sidn.nl> <2015110519525639913345@teleinfo.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2015110519525639913345@teleinfo.cn>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.168.4.205]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F274721B-68D2-4A97-A4A9-260988D9C419"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/kgiZWaIMyDy_SD9IKjOR7p8cIZI>
Cc: Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se>, Declan Ma <madi@zdns.cn>, eppext <EppExt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:12:22 -0000

Hello Jiagui,

I see your point. I am a horrible jabber scribe….I missed that remark by Jim Galvin completely. 

@Chairs: Can you make a clear statement on the list to either confirm or decline my interpretation about the verification drafts being adopted or not. 

Gr,
Rik


> On 05 Nov 2015, at 20:52, xiejiagui@teleinfo.cn wrote:
> 
> Hello Rik,
> Let me post the messages from the Jabber:
> <Catch.jpg>
> <CatchF973.jpg>
> 
> Jim Galvin(JimG?) has confirmed  this . 
> 
> We do think it's useful to discuss this draft in the WG, and any comments about this draft are welcome.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Jiagui Xie
>  
> From: Rik Ribbers <mailto:rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
> Date: 2015-11-05 18:06
> To: Declan Ma <mailto:madi@zdns.cn>
> CC: Ulrich Wisser <mailto:ulrich@wisser.se>; EppExt@ietf.org <mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [eppext] Minutes for our meeting in Yokohama IETF94
> Hello Declan
>  
> The conclusion for me is that there was no objection to work on informational document in general by the working group. There was no clear consensus on working on the informational verification draft James Gould was presenting.
>  
> As it is Thursday on the IETF (read: I am tired) I may be wrong, so feel free to confirm or correct me.
>  
> Gr,
> Rik
>  
> > On 05 Nov 2015, at 18:42, Declan Ma <madi@zdns.cn <mailto:madi@zdns.cn>> wrote:
> > 
> > Ulrich,
> > 
> > It seems that there is an inconsistency  between the minutes and jabber chatting.
> > 
> > According to the jabber, 
> > 
> > 
> > rik.ribbers@jabber.sidn.nl <mailto:rik.ribbers@jabber.sidn.nl>:
> > is the WG opposed to taken onboard Informational
> > 4g6bdlv965tvtus6229@room413.conf.meetecho.com <mailto:4g6bdlv965tvtus6229@room413.conf.meetecho.com>:
> > hummmmm
> > rik.ribbers@jabber.sidn.nl <mailto:rik.ribbers@jabber.sidn.nl>:
> > yes silence no loud hummmm
> > 
> > 
> > So, Discussion about adoption of informational documents
> > 
> > “Hum only for no objection” should be corrected to “Hum only for no, objection”.
> > 
> > 
> > Am I making sense here? 
> > 
> > Shall we review the milestone that contains documents that is still under discussion of adoption?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Di MA
> > 
> > ZDNS Ltd.
> > 
> > http://en.zdns.cn <http://en.zdns.cn/>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> 在 2015年11月5日,17:09,Ulrich Wisser <ulrich@wisser.se <mailto:ulrich@wisser.se>> 写道:
> >> 
> >> Please find my minutes below.
> >> Feedback is welcome!
> >> /Ulrich
> >> 
> >> 
> >> EPPEXT meeting at IETF94 Yokohama 2015-11-05 15:20-17:20
> >> 
> >> Scott Hollenbeck and Ning Kong as interim chair
> >> Both chairs Jim Galvin and Antoin Verschueren in remote participation
> >> 
> >> draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay
> >> draft-eppext-tmch-smd
> >>  Both are through last call and AD Barry Leiba is currently reviewing, response expected in the coming weeks.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> draft-ietf-epppext-launchphase
> >>  Jim Gould updated the document and thinks it is ready for last call.
> >>  shepherd Ulrich Wisser
> >> 
> >> draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-func-spec-00
> >>  shepherd Ulrich Wisser
> >> 
> >> draft-ietf-eppext-idnmap-02
> >> draft-gould-idn-table-02
> >> draft-wilcox-cira-idn-eppext-00
> >>  James Gould speaks on these drafts. idnmap needs even idntables as to specify possible table name values.
> >>  Several of the documents are expired. Renewal is requested or will be directly after the meeting.
> >>  Documents will become milestones in the new charter.
> >>  wilcox will be retracted or moved to epp-registry.
> >> 
> >> Jim Galvin presents a list of documents currently in work and will be milestones 
> >> for the new charter.
> >> 
> >> draft-gould-allocation-token
> >>  James Goulds speaks on the reasoning behind the extensions.
> >>  Opposition to use AuthInfo for this purpose
> >> 
> >> draft-gould-change-poll
> >>  James Gould speaks on the reasoning of the document.
> >>  Clients get updates on changes to objects through the poll queue.
> >> 
> >> draft-gould-epp-rdap-status-mapping
> >>  James Gould presents on the reasoning behind the draft.
> >>  Comments from the room about the question of standards track or informational
> >> 
> >> draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-mapping
> >> draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-ext
> >>  Ning Kong presents
> >>  Discussions about need for RDAP extension 
> >>  Registrar object suggested with support in the room
> >> 
> >> draft-gould-eppext-verificationcode
> >> draft-xie-eppext-nv-mapping
> >>  James Gould presents 
> >>  IPR disclosure
> >> 
> >> Discussion about adoption of informational documents
> >>  Hum only for no objection
> >> 
> >> Discussion about documents to include in working group
> >>  - not draft from Alexander Mayerhofer
> >>  - Jim proposes to divide docs in groups for the milestones
> >>  - opposition and support for nv-mapping document
> >>  - Hum, no objections to milestones
> >>  - charter presentation and discussions
> >>  - Several submissions to not broaden the scope of the group to all things ICANN
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Ulrich Wisser
> >> ulrich@wisser.se <mailto:ulrich@wisser.se>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> EppExt mailing list
> >> EppExt@ietf.org <mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > EppExt mailing list
> > EppExt@ietf.org <mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org <mailto:EppExt@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>