Re: [eppext] Agenda items for Yokohama?

Rik Ribbers <> Mon, 21 September 2015 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2697B1A6FB2 for <>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.084
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ew0wGAhTl-m9 for <>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:d78:0:147:94:198:152:69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41FF71A1ABE for <>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt;; s=sidn-nl; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:x-originating-ip:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zbNA3qov0+/lQpujXEcplugXV3xFrcvEVCjPk8kGw5k=; b=HDY+kQk/FOY4/6aVf8kIw3Zk+rb/kYjykrOTolfajnZu0CQvVRYIqARBycJielTyHLYPmKOqKpImdPMZnPcbEhx3Tp/MbQWngKaVS5YVQSxIaSKpQkAAf+w/G9pZLCnOAePBd6/VQ7vPFvR0IoSISu3RzSe+hGM/WgmZqq5mnekAq7r9WxmiDFhHf+d5KBwJKQeVbVkrbVY2BqOnI2WnSey+rD3hSkjdgcdH1D8mBBgzLiEVGdvpZDlHvCObt8FYB9fj7Fs4NbrnRJyC/uefIYYZMTB7S/I1Crcu/wTZP/5jZgcPiOGWWqY0xlT4D4bHQqLwHqNSoU//Ik242jRWpQ==
Received: from ka-mbx03.SIDN.local ([]) by with ESMTP id t8LBu2kO017076-t8LBu2kQ017076 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:56:02 +0200
Received: from KAHUBCASN02.SIDN.local ( by ka-mbx03.SIDN.local ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:56:01 +0200
Received: from KAMBX1.SIDN.local ([fe80::501d:affc:30a9:4edf]) by kahubcasn02 ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:56:01 +0200
From: Rik Ribbers <>
To: "'Hollenbeck, Scott'" <>, Antoin Verschuren <>, "" <>, "James Galvin (" <>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Agenda items for Yokohama?
Thread-Index: AQHQ8WOtRPykBYSfn020PvnrB4JNtp5Gt6MAgAAriCA=
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:56:01 +0000
Message-ID: <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768BA26CCA5@kambx1.SIDN.local>
References: <> <> <> <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768BA25A0FC@kambx2.SIDN.local> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Agenda items for Yokohama?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:56:41 -0000


I have been trying to get an update off-mailing list for a few weeks now for keyrelay from Jim and/or Antoin, but it seems there has not been any progress. I would like to move forward ahead of IETF94 to resolve any issues that might come out of IESG review in Yokohama. However as I am not a IETF veteran and I might be overlooking some steps that need to be taken before IESG review...but can we at least take these steps?


-----Original Message-----
From: EppExt [] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: maandag 21 september 2015 13:09
To: Antoin Verschuren;
Subject: Re: [eppext] Agenda items for Yokohama?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EppExt [] On Behalf Of Antoin 
> Verschuren
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 12:12 PM
> To:
> Subject: [eppext] Agenda items for Yokohama?
> Dear WG,
> My deepest apologies for not seeming to be active the past weeks.
> Rik pinged me earlier this week why I didn’t respond to EPPEXT mail 
> when I did receive other IETF mail and it turned out that changing 
> back my holidays email filter back to normal late august made all 
> EPPEXT mail disappear into my postponed mailbox. That’s fixed now, so 
> I’m doing the backlog.
> Reading the list, it seems we have a demand to meet in Yokohama.
> Jim and I will make a request tomorrow for a meeting slot.
> To get an impression on how much time we need, this is a request for 
> agenda items.
> If you want time to speak, or have other items for on the agenda, 
> please let the chairs know.
> Jim and I will make a preliminary agenda, but it’s you that have to 
> prepare the talks ;-)

Antoin, I'd very much like to know what's happening with our re-charter discussion and the documents that have been WG-last-called with no further progression (draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd, draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase, draft-ietf-eppext-keyrelay). These might not be agenda items, but if not they should be clearly addressed before we meet.

EppExt mailing list