Re: [eppext] [IANA #814919] INSERT “Whois Info Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)"

Patrick Mevzek <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr> Sat, 04 April 2015 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA7C1B2AF1 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.25
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.25 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlE0HMlpXlmW for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4243B1B2AEF for <eppext@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 04:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B21728052E; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 13:33:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052F62802D1; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 13:33:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (citrine.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:96]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4D5B3800C; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 13:32:58 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1428147178.23081.7.camel@citrine-mobile>
From: Patrick Mevzek <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr>
To: Ning Kong <nkong@cnnic.cn>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 13:32:58 +0200
In-Reply-To: <153327CB-6105-4B2B-A317-6277DD5543A6@cnnic.cn>
References: <RT-Ticket-814919@icann.org> <6497ECBE-C745-494A-A40D-04B29FF5A074@verisign.com> <rt-4.2.9-2033-1427129135-813.814919-9-0@icann.org> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F49F89B85@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <153327CB-6105-4B2B-A317-6277DD5543A6@cnnic.cn>
Organization: AFNIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2+b1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/mzx_ISUJD7YgTWLcD9aJ_Zswmic>
Cc: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [eppext] =?utf-8?q?=5BIANA_=23814919=5D_INSERT_=E2=80=9CWhois_Inf?= =?utf-8?q?o_Extension_for_the_Extensible_Provisioning_Protocol_=28EPP=29?= =?utf-8?q?=22?=
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 11:33:31 -0000

Le samedi 04 avril 2015 à 19:05 +0800, Ning Kong a écrit :
> One comments,
> I have the same concerns as Scott about the IRIS. As far as I know, only DENIC uses IRIS. I’m not sure who is still interested in using this optional element.

DENIC stopped using IRIS long ago, see
www.denic.de/en/denic-in-dialogue/news/3767.html

Shutdown Notification: DENIC to discontinue DCHK (Domain Check) lookup
service as of 3 December 2013

[…]
Given that the protocol underlying DCHK, i.e. the Internet Registry
Information Service (IRIS) standard, has never gained a relevant
foothold in the market, and therefore DCHK kept being employed by a
small number of users only, continuing the service is no longer
justifiable, from a cost-benefit point of view.

</quote>

See my previous reply in this thread, AFAIK only AFNIC has an IRIS
server today.

-- 
Patrick Mevzek