IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Mon, 14 September 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82721A871E for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imDSeGL0W4oG for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2FF21B5385 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:28 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:28 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2
Thread-Index: AQHQ4dgotzrKbgDz4kiJHJmKV5Edw54mbv0AgAAbuAD//8JkAIAWhr2A///Z/oA=
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:00:28 +0000
Message-ID: <D21C8E3B.F063%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <55E0D247.2020408@elistx.com> <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768BA233E3B@kambx1.SIDN.local> <5BFD186DCB661E4D951017B0818285AEDE761E65@kambx1.SIDN.local> <D209C95E.E92F%edward.lewis@icann.org> <20150914171627.GP2480@x28.adm.denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150914171627.GP2480@x28.adm.denic.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3525087625_6745221"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/n74MBRvyiEbDEVdtpwDe1UlRHQc>
Subject: Re: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:00:34 -0000

On 9/14/15, 13:16, "EppExt on behalf of Peter Koch"
<eppext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:

>That said, the part that makes me nervous is the very prominent position
>of ICANN within the charter text.  I understand that that is a motivating
>factor, but I'd really wish the IETF was a bit more careful to not become
>the 'standards delivery wing' of said organization.  The existence of a
>domain name world outside ICANN should be explicitly acknowledged.

ICANN's interest, if you will, in RDAP would be a motivation for people to
participate but "ICANN" shouldn't be the reason for the IETF to charter a
group.  That EPP is used across different categories of registries and
RDAP is well established in RIRs, the topic demonstrates broader appeal
than simply something ICANN is expected to move towards.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email