Re: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Mon, 14 September 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82721A871E for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imDSeGL0W4oG for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2FF21B5385 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:28 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:00:28 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2
Thread-Index: AQHQ4dgotzrKbgDz4kiJHJmKV5Edw54mbv0AgAAbuAD//8JkAIAWhr2A///Z/oA=
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:00:28 +0000
Message-ID: <D21C8E3B.F063%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <55E0D247.2020408@elistx.com> <C80127C588F8F2409E2B535AF968B768BA233E3B@kambx1.SIDN.local> <5BFD186DCB661E4D951017B0818285AEDE761E65@kambx1.SIDN.local> <D209C95E.E92F%edward.lewis@icann.org> <20150914171627.GP2480@x28.adm.denic.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150914171627.GP2480@x28.adm.denic.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3525087625_6745221"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/n74MBRvyiEbDEVdtpwDe1UlRHQc>
Subject: Re: [eppext] revised draft charter - v2
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:00:34 -0000

On 9/14/15, 13:16, "EppExt on behalf of Peter Koch"
<eppext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of pk@DENIC.DE> wrote:

>That said, the part that makes me nervous is the very prominent position
>of ICANN within the charter text.  I understand that that is a motivating
>factor, but I'd really wish the IETF was a bit more careful to not become
>the 'standards delivery wing' of said organization.  The existence of a
>domain name world outside ICANN should be explicitly acknowledged.

ICANN's interest, if you will, in RDAP would be a motivation for people to
participate but "ICANN" shouldn't be the reason for the IETF to charter a
group.  That EPP is used across different categories of registries and
RDAP is well established in RIRs, the topic demonstrates broader appeal
than simply something ICANN is expected to move towards.