IETF Logo Mail Archive

[eppext] RDAP adoption?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 10 November 2015 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDEF1B3067; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:43:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SIHsK8I7uMQx; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:43:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCD3F1B3066; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.11.114] (104-60-96-29.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [104.60.96.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tAA3hIoH018531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Nov 2015 19:43:19 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: weirds@ietf.org, eppext@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <564167D3.7050805@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:43:15 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 19:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/q-lYexTkiVjfZLofmjnaad29fBE>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:41:39 -0800
Cc: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Subject: [eppext] RDAP adoption?
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:43:22 -0000

(Andy Newton asked me to post this question to these lists...)


Hi.

I'm trying to discover the current field maturity of RDAP.

  *  How much operational deployment of servers supporting it is there?

  *  How much client deployment in software?

  *  But ultimately how much client/server use of the protocol is
     there, so far?

  *  Any sense of the adoption/use trends?

  *  Any sense of what is delaying more and better adoption/use?

  *  Any sense of what might improve things?

Thanks.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email