Re: [eppext] rechartering

["Marc Blanchet" <[e-mail]>]

On 29 Jul 2015, at 11:56, Andrew Newton wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Marc Blanchet
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> I disagree with putting a priority in the (new) charter. I think this 
>> is
>> just a triage function that can be done by the chairs, depending on 
>> which
>> topic needs more priority. We may end up having epp-ext-1 and 
>> rdap-ext-4 be
>> higher priorities than epp-ext-2.  Again, just a chair+wg triage 
>> function to
>> me.
>
> I think it is important to be sensitive to the EPP work that has

sure.

> already built up. I do not care about the mechanism to address it.

my point is that the priorities shall be off the charter itself, more a 
matter of wg management.


> Another solution would be to add a 3rd co-chair if the necessary.

not sure it does help. Increasing the number of managers usually 
decrease the efficiency of an organization, at least in my experience 
;-)

> You
> need a blue dot, Marc? :)

I prefer the white ones.

Marc.

>
>> I also think that the level of work is not too heavy and can easily 
>> be
>> handled in a single working group.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> Here is a proposal for the working group name: regext  (REGistration
>> protocols EXTensions)
>
> Or maybe PIRO: Protocols for Internet Registry Operations.
>
> -andy