Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

"James Galvin" <> Sat, 30 January 2016 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710B21B2B89 for <>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:13:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZwSHS5WJO0vL for <>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:13:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5321B2B88 for <>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:13:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id s5so35301459qkd.0 for <>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:13:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v83WjTpXmvLTDP+aT7gEVevROFget0oL29od2Kpv4Io=; b=xLjdcWzwapGy16aLqOMBb1BhTWyAyniNCwXJ4H76pHnoHU0haf1WrXMtITD29UFB5r g0wppdDhm4zJdoVCHbdHrAQauR0vWB7p2Qs0+Axut64iCLTevi6u9JNMwF2C/dlO+xg4 bzo+paHZeGTyuq8u/6Sx1Wa6nAe2edZG2IJMLUeTEGxsN0IpghWeomSc3ZfR5lQ5C/6s 7LFVQdv6YSMxyUSxljalthOmvprnVbeD3cc9iG//gEBcWayFmYO8DEhkvP5SjmD6W40T EDf24xiEaLccIa6aiaJzoTZp5YtAqknRjcyqfeFIFamUMnY5e8uABs7iriFsh8vT6smd B1Kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v83WjTpXmvLTDP+aT7gEVevROFget0oL29od2Kpv4Io=; b=TOsvv9dCq2maectct/lDd9X6KvcO7bbB651NEM6jRtzOFhV3RACi9EG5a4hwDSPHsx 9KIT1AQ1S6/DL+sgBOQwp3PmVL4IVdf7y1ndeoEsVtnmeRkva0jpRIpjj2gd13horZ7g KbsGBIWcU+rj2cl9mEPih0gifxDxG/DEV8cRqt/eUb4uumbmuX8mpeXVeWv4hoLGtHpS vMRWXUIbYZs+CzcXFWwx5leOnwNqoLx6gG3MhuoLsjkbtga7c8DB4y2CuL41XhiX+VOF noiAAuiBzsQ5JQ7M7omh/psnO0gvRV5q7yw3N3ZEXLFCt9G0HMp/1QSOswwUVidXMPQw fSPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORB7BIDX7jDKJVx47jvjRJDutBDoxES2KtgH/2pqNLDFC7drAWGR6IDpz0s8I94JQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id d83mr17755339qkb.22.1454163231767; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:13:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id w75sm8328260qka.49.2016. (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 30 Jan 2016 06:13:49 -0800 (PST)
From: James Galvin <>
To: eppext <>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:13:51 -0500
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.3r5187)
Archived-At: <>
Cc: Barry Leiba <>
Subject: Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 14:13:54 -0000

There have been no additional comments regarding the charter since my 
message below yesterday.  So, Antoin and I declaring working group 
consensus for this document and submitting this to Barry for IESG 

Thanks to everyone who commented.


On 29 Jan 2016, at 15:38, James Galvin wrote:

> So far those that have commented have all supported the charter as 
> attached.
> Gustavo made a suggestion for an additional milestone but that has not 
> received much support.  The proposal in this case is to focus on 
> getting the charter updated and then we can update the milestones 
> later if that is appropriate.  It is also worth mentioned that there 
> is some discussion about Gustavo’s document progressing on ICANN’s 
> gtld-tech list and I don’t think we should interrupt that just yet.
> We did say that today would be the last day for comments.  I didn’t 
> indicate a time so we’ll go with close of business everywhere.  
> Barry is already aware of this and I’ll send him an “official” 
> note tomorrow morning that the charter is ready to go.
> The question of what will happen to the mailing lists has been asked 
> by a few people.  When we formally submit the charter and it is 
> approved then Barry will make the appropriate requests for the 
> following to happen.
> 1. The regext list will be created.
> 2. Subscribers of all of “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” 
> will be subscribed to regext.
> 3. The lists “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” will be 
> aliased to point to “regext”.
> All of this should just happen and we should all just take note when 
> it does and then start using the appropriate alias for sending 
> messages to the list.
> If there are any other questions or concerns please do speak up.
> Thanks,
> Jim
> On 22 Jan 2016, at 16:11, James Galvin wrote:
>> Attached is the final charter for the new working group.  It has all 
>> changes discussed to date and the milestones as agreed on the list.
>> There is one change I included that got very little discussion on the 
>> list and I wanted to call it out so folks could consider if they want 
>> to keep it or remove it.  This is the reason for a “last call” on 
>> the charter before committing it to the IESG.
>> Marc Blanchet proposed the text I included in this message:
>> There was no response to this message on the list.
>> Marc first made the suggestion here:
>> As Chair I had suggested we not include the change but Jacques Latour 
>> asked to have the change included.  Here is the final message in this 
>> short thread:
>> Would working group members please indicate their support or 
>> objection for this change by Friday, 29 January 2017.  It’s a two 
>> sentence change to the charter if folks want to remove it.
>> Jim