Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

["James Galvin" <[e-mail]>]

There have been no additional comments regarding the charter since my 
message below yesterday.  So, Antoin and I declaring working group 
consensus for this document and submitting this to Barry for IESG 
review.

Thanks to everyone who commented.

Jim



On 29 Jan 2016, at 15:38, James Galvin wrote:

> So far those that have commented have all supported the charter as 
> attached.
>
> Gustavo made a suggestion for an additional milestone but that has not 
> received much support.  The proposal in this case is to focus on 
> getting the charter updated and then we can update the milestones 
> later if that is appropriate.  It is also worth mentioned that there 
> is some discussion about Gustavo’s document progressing on ICANN’s 
> gtld-tech list and I don’t think we should interrupt that just yet.
>
> We did say that today would be the last day for comments.  I didn’t 
> indicate a time so we’ll go with close of business everywhere.  
> Barry is already aware of this and I’ll send him an “official” 
> note tomorrow morning that the charter is ready to go.
>
> The question of what will happen to the mailing lists has been asked 
> by a few people.  When we formally submit the charter and it is 
> approved then Barry will make the appropriate requests for the 
> following to happen.
>
> 1. The regext list will be created.
> 2. Subscribers of all of “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” 
> will be subscribed to regext.
> 3. The lists “provreg”, “weirds”, and “eppext” will be 
> aliased to point to “regext”.
>
> All of this should just happen and we should all just take note when 
> it does and then start using the appropriate alias for sending 
> messages to the list.
>
> If there are any other questions or concerns please do speak up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
>
> On 22 Jan 2016, at 16:11, James Galvin wrote:
>
>> Attached is the final charter for the new working group.  It has all 
>> changes discussed to date and the milestones as agreed on the list.
>>
>> There is one change I included that got very little discussion on the 
>> list and I wanted to call it out so folks could consider if they want 
>> to keep it or remove it.  This is the reason for a “last call” on 
>> the charter before committing it to the IESG.
>>
>>
>> Marc Blanchet proposed the text I included in this message:
>>
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/-Ef1Pdi-9uFIZC7yTAYDeIxCZV0
>>
>> There was no response to this message on the list.
>>
>>
>> Marc first made the suggestion here:
>>
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/ouE4fgfXAUWJG96XvgqjDR9OfoQ
>>
>> As Chair I had suggested we not include the change but Jacques Latour 
>> asked to have the change included.  Here is the final message in this 
>> short thread:
>>
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/jCF6tfwIFVGi6E8lXFFKU0TVW3Q
>>
>>
>> Would working group members please indicate their support or 
>> objection for this change by Friday, 29 January 2017.  It’s a two 
>> sentence change to the charter if folks want to remove it.
>>
>> Jim