Re: [eppext] rechartering
Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Wed, 29 July 2015 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <patrick@shaktot.patoche.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1421ACE64
for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id zdnCV1fXgpOl for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaktot.patoche.org (shaktot.patoche.org [212.85.152.86])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89FD81A89F5
for <eppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaktot.patoche.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by shaktot.patoche.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id t6TLJmfU005571
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:19:48 +0200
Received: (from patrick@localhost)
by shaktot.patoche.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id t6TLJlfs005570;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:19:47 +0200
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:19:46 +0200
From: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>
To: eppext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150729211946.GA8346@home.patoche.org>
References: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20150729000315.GA30829@home.patoche.org>
<CAAQiQRdQ=3rAJFxLDcr25o+qgezGd1ceScuyj7kC5jwkh6G_vg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRdQ=3rAJFxLDcr25o+qgezGd1ceScuyj7kC5jwkh6G_vg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Scanned-By: shaktot_dot_patoche_dot_org on 212.85.152.86
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/s0SR_XO9aD2ryccKOiUchQ0QF-8>
Subject: Re: [eppext] rechartering
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>,
<mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>,
<mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 21:20:01 -0000
Hello, Summarizing my views: - I agree there is a need to coordinate EPP extensions, and RDAP ones, - however I do not see such a great overlap between the two (except the fact that both protocols will be run by the same entity), and I do not have heard any other cases than Jim's and Scott's drafts (but I'm an RDAP newbie for now, despite having promised to build a client), and at least for the one on statuses, I see only work on the RDAP part, and none on the EPP part - I fear that merging topics will create more work, not less and complicate things, for examples on building milestones - and seeing already the discussions on how to prioritize things or how to name the new WG seem to prove that point. - at the end of the day, I'm not against the idea, I just do not see it as a huge improvement. In all cases I would be happy to join and participate in the new merged WG if it so happens after motivated people going forward in that route -- Patrick Mevzek
- [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Marc Blanchet
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Hollenbeck, Scott
- [eppext] Fwd: rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering Ulrich Wisser
- Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering Roger D Carney
- Re: [eppext] [weirds] Fwd: rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Rik Ribbers
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Marc Blanchet
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Andrew Newton
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Marc Blanchet
- Re: [eppext] rechartering Patrick Mevzek