Re: [eppext] WG Last Call - final charter

["James Galvin" <[e-mail]>]

On 26 Jan 2016, at 3:00, Rik Ribbers wrote:

> However as time has passed a new draft has 
> surfaced(draft-lozano-ietf-eppext-registrar-expiration-date)  Should 
> we add this to the milestone list or not?
>
> I prefer not to add them and do a call for adoption when we finally 
> have the new charter in place (as we can do this based on our new 
> charter).

Thanks for your question!

We decided not to add anything that has not already been discussed for 
just this reason.  The milestones also set the priority for our tasks.

We can always change this but I think it’s more prudent to get a 
baseline established and then change as we go when needed.

Of course, if folks prefer a different path please do speak up.


> One side question:
>
> Will we alias the mailinglists (eppext, provreg weirds) into a new one 
> as discussed here: 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/Ja8eCegrdMAFd-DwZHkHWl0t6AI
>
> Shouldn’t this be in the charter somewhere or is this just something 
> operational when the new charter is approved? Again I hope for the 
> last as I do not want to delay the rechartering process.

I don’t know about provreg but for eppext and weirds it is an 
operational issue and it will just happen.  I haven’t asked about the 
details but I presume that subscribers from both will be added to the 
new list.  We’ll get the specifics and let folks know.

Jim