IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eppext] Fw: I-D Action: draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-00.txt

Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> Sun, 17 May 2015 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <patrick@shaktot.patoche.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B2C1A88B8 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2015 18:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0AII6s9MQx4r for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 May 2015 18:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaktot.patoche.org (shaktot.patoche.org [212.85.152.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD6871A8925 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 May 2015 18:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaktot.patoche.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shaktot.patoche.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id t4H1Z8LM023289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 17 May 2015 03:35:08 +0200
Received: (from patrick@localhost) by shaktot.patoche.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id t4H1Z8cv023265; Sun, 17 May 2015 03:35:08 +0200
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 03:35:07 +0200
From: Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com>
To: eppext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150517013507.GB27144@home.patoche.org>
References: <20150504162934440371144@cnnic.cn> <20150517001433.GA26237@home.patoche.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150517001433.GA26237@home.patoche.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Scanned-By: shaktot_dot_patoche_dot_org on 212.85.152.86
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/suiH9D-s2e43d88c9phRwazy1pI>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Fw: I-D Action: draft-zhou-eppext-reseller-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 01:36:35 -0000

Patrick Mevzek <pm@dotandco.com> 2015-05-17 02:15
> - I'm not sure to understand completely the update case.
> In short, in my understanding, I would expect that there would be a
> sentence stating that "only one add, or rem or chg element is
> permitted", so that there are not mix of add/rem/chg, because in that
> later case it would be difficult to understand what happens.

The comments in the XML schema are strange:
<!--
Child elements of <reseller:update> command
Cannot be added or removed, only change is allowed
At least one element should be present
-->

-- 
Patrick Mevzek

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email