Re: [eppext] launchphase + domain check

["Gould, James" <[e-mail]>]

We also support the standard check form for all launch phases.  The launchphase draft extends the domain mapping to define new forms of checks targeted for the launch phases, but there is no intent to disallow the use of the standard availability check defined in the domain mapping.


—


JG


[cid:[e-mail]]

James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
[e-mail]

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

VerisignInc.com<http://VerisignInc.com>

On Jul 14, 2015, at 2:56 AM, Alexander Mayrhofer <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Hello Rik,

We understand that the element MUST only be included by the client when one of the „special“ check forms is used. Therefore, we do allow „vanilla“ EPP domain checks for the whole runtime of the registry, including all “launch phases”.

This also seems what registrars are expecting even during the Claims period, because they usually perform a “normal” check before they attempt a create, and only when that fails, they re-query with the Claims check form..

Alex



Von: EppExt [mailto:[e-mail]] Im Auftrag von Rik Ribbers
Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2015 17:26
An: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Betreff: [eppext] launchphase + domain check

All,

I've had a very interesting discussion regarding the launchphase draft. The discussion focusses around the domain check and the TMCH claims period. Section 2.3 of the I-D states that:

** quote on **
The server MAY support multiple launch phases sequentially or simultaneously.  The <launch:phase> element MUST be included by the client to define the target launch phase of the command.
** quote off **

So when doing a domain check during a TMCH claims period the domain check in the "Claims check form", "Availability Check Form" and "Trademark Check Form" must contain the <launch:phase> element describing the active phase.

So far so good. But what about the "normal operation" domain check. This is the standard epp domain check (without the launchphase extension). The draft does not explicitly say anything about it, but according to Section 2.3 one could argue that this is not allowed during a TMCH claims period as there is no <launch:phase> element provided.

I would love to here from other WG-members what they think about this...

Kind regards,
Rik Ribbers
_______________________________________________
EppExt mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext