Re: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd

Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org> Wed, 22 July 2015 10:59 UTC

Return-Path: <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C001B29D9 for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xKOf9grayq9I for <eppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1761AD377 for <eppext@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:59:03 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:59:03 -0700
From: Gustavo Lozano <gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>, eppext <eppext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
Thread-Index: AQHQxG1rNsssOk20KUap0K9n1ORj0g==
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:59:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D543EC.B16AD%gustavo.lozano@icann.org>
References: <7369519F-6887-4ECB-9525-DA02EC5BFBBA@antoin.nl> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022D92@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A022D92@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.3.150624
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3520414736_20838490"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/wgWCzpBmzAwvFelzm63NnhhSu5E>
Subject: Re: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:59:07 -0000

Thank you Scott,

I will address your comments in the next version of the draft.

Regards,
Gustavo

On 7/21/15, 15:20, "EppExt on behalf of Hollenbeck, Scott"
<eppext-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: EppExt [mailto:eppext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin
>> Verschuren
>> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 4:03 PM
>> To: eppext@ietf.org
>> Subject: [eppext] Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-
>> smd
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> 
>> This is the starting of the WGLC on the Mark and Signed Mark Objects
>> Mapping.
>> We believe this document is ready for WGLC.
>> The current version of this document can be found here:
>> 
>>   https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-eppext-tmch-smd-01.txt
>
>I have reviewed this document. Comments:
>
>Section 1: Please expand the ICANN acronym and include a normative
>reference for the "Trademark Clearinghouse". I'm asking for a normative
>reference because this document describes the format of structures that
>are "defined" by the TMCH. One really has to understand the TMCH to
>understand why these formats are needed.
>
>Section 2.3: RFC 3275 (a draft standard) is probably a better normative
>reference for an IETF document than a URI to a W3C document.
>
>A question: is this still good advice from a security perspective?
>
>"SHA256/RSA-SHA256 SHOULD be used for digesting and signing. The size of
>the RSA key SHOULD be at least 2048 bits."
>
>Section 7: The IANA Consideration section should include a subsection to
>register this extension in the EPP extensions registry. Templates should
>also be added to register the two schemas. There's an example of schema
>registration in RFC 5731.
>
>Section 8: I have to disagree with the "The object mapping described in
>this document does not provide any security services or introduce any
>additional considerations" statement. For example, more text might be
>needed here to address considerations associated with the algorithm
>recommendations made in Section 2.3.
>
>Scott
>
>_______________________________________________
>EppExt mailing list
>EppExt@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext