Re: [ericas] Stuck getting visas for IETF meetings

Nicolas Ruiz <nicolas@internettraffic.com> Thu, 02 May 2013 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <nicolas@internettraffic.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B45521F86BB for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTUbczR-ke4T for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hostingnet.com (mail.hostingnet.com [208.87.35.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA0521F8554 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.2.15] (unknown [74.222.88.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@internettraffic.com) by mail.hostingnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A4A743674D for <ericas@irtf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <518276D0.1050805@internettraffic.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 09:23:12 -0500
From: Nicolas Ruiz <nicolas@internettraffic.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ericas@irtf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428234454.06a3c160@elandnews.com> <CAKe6YvNcVy15FBWxOe6c4tOBM-FgL3zco56qT2h_O1v5jdVaEA@mail.gmail.com> <A9F64458-DD4D-40EF-BE19-8EA22C2CBA04@tzi.org> <518255DB.9090004@si6networks.com> <518271E6.5000805@internettraffic.com> <518274EA.9040904@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <518274EA.9040904@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [ericas] Stuck getting visas for IETF meetings
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 14:23:22 -0000

On 05/02/2013 09:15 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 11:02 AM, Nicolas Ruiz wrote:
>> On 05/02/2013 07:02 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2013 06:28 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There is not much we can do about the visa complexity at the IETF level.
>>>> But we can do two things:
>>>>
>>>> -- collect information about relative levels of complexities exhibited
>>>>      by different venues.  Right now I would guess (but don't know) that
>>>>      it is easier for many to go to Canada than to the US.
>>>
>>> That's mostly a myth, I would say. In the same way that quite a few
>>> times the folks at the Canadian border have been much less polite (if
>>> you know what I mean) than at the US border.
>>
>> I don't think is a myth. In my experience it's more difficult to be
>> granted a visa to visit the US than western Europe.
>
> Wasn't the discussion about "US vs Canada"?
>
I understand that the question is in regard to different venues, and 
pose the issue of Canada vs USA visa as an example. But even if the 
issue is strictly Canada vs USA, I think the perception that obtaining a 
visa to the USA is more difficult that a visa to Canada is accurate.

nicolas