Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion
Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 00:52 UTC
Return-Path: <vinayakh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id D962121F9903 for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P6117UO+VYDw for
<ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-da0-x229.google.com (mail-da0-x229.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
335FE21F98FE for <ericas@irtf.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-da0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p8so1135817dan.14 for
<ericas@irtf.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=xdU44l+zZ+muOjqno1eZuV07Y7YZS5CJqKb3zn1Cmj4=;
b=UcbUKDZXf53PYLgdfCZCkw6Pew/uNIqgspsIktBRlHyMxrYcUHv//85JC2DVnR7UlQ
zTQrHZI0r5gQSmKNicanY6tATK76cyQ53hgAld0avyJPwNDl0IPtUY2lzENDhfTFZQPT
MAxQLkl2inHdOuehZMhR2j8gzBcArElmkEZLUkryxciGHDIATH8FugP0Fr1ghQUW33TW
qR8qBh/hIta54t9yoS9rLTcueThysOMrY641vpROEI8t0RL0pPslBNbzu37Sh4bMpRC8
tzRoxFwUHHxCO7e0/fl6+ZJy3HSQu37omnW1u8KhBlmhYyTJSSjga5aNWTTIylk9Ljr1 WjaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.102.66 with SMTP id fm2mr10804030pbb.168.1367196742945;
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.156.234 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <517D755D.8050902@nomountain.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428091705.0cbc0b60@elandnews.com>
<517D755D.8050902@nomountain.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:22:22 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKe6YvNgjmONFJf0DpJ8S8kn40aDhZwd26D81U+kFVQmPeZoCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b675dea3398f304db754cc9
Cc: ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And
Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>,
<mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>,
<mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:52:24 -0000
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Melinda Shore < melinda.shore@nomountain.net> wrote: > On 4/28/13 10:55 AM, S Moonesamy wrote: > > There is the money barrier. It is very expensive to attend IETF > > meetings. It's nearly impossible to get funding probably because the > > local community does not see any value in the IETF. There are a few > > people who may have heard of the IETF. Some of them have very little > > understanding of how the IETF works. > > Do you feel that ISOC has a role to play in this? > ISOC has been doing a decent job with the ISOC fellowship to the IETF and NGL (Next Generation Leaders) programme. What would help is some kind of workshops co-located with ISOC regional Chapters events which give an idea of what IETF meeting works and how to participate. Maybe a local co-ordinated effort when IETF meetings are in progress. > > I should add that I'm not thrilled with the emphasis on meeting > attendance as a marker of participation or non-participation. We > may not be doing a very good job of communicating how to participate > in the IETF process without traveling to meetings. > > Yes and No. First the Yes part. Agree on the part that IETF meetings should not be used as a marker. Why the reserved No ? Traveling to a meeting is a very different experience than attending remotely. A couple of examples to qualify my reservations. When participating remotely, it is not possible to have/eavesdrop on corridor conversations. Much of my IETF learning has been this way. I listen into conversations and ask "dumb" questions. Most people are helpful with pointers and context. People who attend IETF regularly underestimate the amount of knowledge trapped in the heads of regular IETF attendees. Another aspect is cultural. I have been lucky enough to get several good mentors at IETF who encouraged me. I have also been lucky to have attended a few meetings thanks to ISOC. The #1 piece of advice I give to people from Asia (especially South-east Asia) is to not take the comments on the draft / discussions personally. You will not believe the cultural shock that people get from direct feedback. People have thanked me for giving this advice. In Asia, we are every non-confrontational so it can be a little jarring to attend some of the WG meetings. I had worked with an American based MNC where this kind of interactions were quite frequent but even for me the initial IETF WG meetings were a little jarring. I will not bore people with the details though. I have come to appreciate deeply this aspect of IETF culture to "get stuff done" but it does take a while to get it. Regards Vinayak
- [ericas] Starting the discussion S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Melinda Shore
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion SM
- [ericas] How and why Internet protocols work well… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] How and why Internet protocols work … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Dhruv Dhody