Re: [ericas] Western, individualist conception of things (was: A suggestion for the Tao of the IETF)

Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <vinayakh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD5D21F9F36 for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SwxbrJiwrNRb for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B2021F9F1D for <ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj3so8217824pad.0 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=07voDtnH8fiExe4tfurTx5TRPK9Lg7JwZV/Hbu8ochM=; b=GuhV+I5Zrs10s6iSIe+XgGWfY9RI2KstMjx9UjKZI/cE9a8P3Hj1Vs6LhCOvQolLRC rhUc9z/dwIK4WY14y1AZGD9V4u3qVv5ZwJUrcClywz9v2INhQvjoQ7bP1css+nWhEeDw TeJnom70DLWWGZkkDJgEwAeXtJodrho12aEfm595W8bHS1z2WHXJ2Pt35wX6pR9c03Td ZHVMeOfmgiL7fOVOjiccmID1Hed/LlxkW7xo/tdbG1F2WVrt9gpm23OuBgAyxjyWJoVV qQOQdqFqGlDnJygroZVzs/W/ScUPNZY9Sa5ElwVG0Ld8g3AEbuT8Ms9aM2v9uCY1tV17 4LPA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.220.197 with SMTP id py5mr17589000pac.86.1371839507944; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.232.233 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B921CDF@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130621053830.07841938@elandsys.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B921CDF@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:01:47 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKe6YvNqTbwYzjXd4sBjpYM_gfmFp9H3eqVqGk_xcCgTeLDpHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vinayak Hegde <vinayakh@gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5dba928f5e8b04dfae46be"
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, "<ericas@irtf.org>" <ericas@irtf.org>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [ericas] Western, individualist conception of things (was: A suggestion for the Tao of the IETF)
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:31:53 -0000

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:39 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>
> > Humberto asked the following question: "If there is anybody in this mail
> list from big vendors like Juniper, Cisco, Extreme, and others, please let
> me know what you have done to stimulate your engineers from emerging
> countries to get involved with IETF".  There wasn't any reply.  There was a
> similar question on the IETF discussion mailing list.  There wasn't any
> answer to it.
>
> I can discuss this from a Cisco perspective, although of course not to be
> taken as a formal statement from the company. I will wonder what a general
> IETF question has to do with an IRTF RG, but I'll let that go.
>
> Cisco has about 450 buildings worldwide; a large cluster are in San Jose
> California, but we have engineering offices in Massachusetts, North
> Carolina, Texas, Ireland, Scotland, England, Holland, France, Switzerland,
> Israel, India, China, and Japan (and probably some other places I haven't
> thought of; this is off the top of my head). We don't think of them as
> being in, or not in, developing countries; we think of them as being the
> locations of engineering groups. If a given engineering group has need for
> standards work, that engineering group is on the hook to do it. If that
> means someone from Bangalore needs to attend an IETF meeting, someone from
> Bangalore needs to attend an IETF meeting.
>
> I'll give you one specific instance. I was asked to consider being a
> mentor for an ISOC Fellow that worked for Cisco in India. I contacted the
> guy, his manager, and Steve Conte, who manages Fellows for ISOC. I thought
> it was great that the guy wanted to attend, and I told him I would mentor
> him. But we get into an interesting problem with the fact that we send
> money to ISOC as a 501(c)3; we can't be seen as deriving benefit from that,
> and I could imagine an interesting audit outcome. I told the guy's manager
> that he needed to belly up to the travel expense. The guy came. We have had
> other engineers from Cisco in India attend as well.
>
> I think the question got no answer because it was malformed. The better
> question would be "do companies X, Y, and Z have engineering offices in
> developing countries and expect engineers there to be involved in standards
> work when appropriate?" The answer, from Cisco and I imagine from our
> competitors, would be "yes".


Interestingly of the two/three other Indians I met at Maastricht one was
mentored by Fred (Raj Singh / Cisco) and another by Lars (Varun Singh).
Thanks guys. The only other guy was a researcher from S. Korea whose mentor
was also a IETF contributor. Maybe some of you should chime in on the
mentorship thread on IETF mailing list.

-- Vinayak