Re: [ericas] How and why Internet protocols work well or badly in emerging regions
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 28 April 2013 22:58 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6BA9C21F8523 for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.867,
BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SRl0fRDZmFxm for
<ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E9521F8518 for <ericas@irtf.org>;
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 798ABBE47; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:58:14 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
(mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id
WFJfSZ6uOK72; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:58:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.10] (unknown [86.46.22.79]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie
(Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A51F6BE3E; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:58:13 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <517DA985.5050105@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:58:13 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428091705.0cbc0b60@elandnews.com>
<517D755D.8050902@nomountain.net> <517D7C75.4090806@cs.tcd.ie>
<6.2.5.6.2.20130428151412.0cbaa210@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428151412.0cbaa210@elandnews.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] How and why Internet protocols work well or badly in
emerging regions
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And
Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>,
<mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>,
<mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:58:37 -0000
Hiya, On 04/28/2013 11:35 PM, S Moonesamy wrote: > Hi Stephen, > At 12:45 28-04-2013, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> Sort of agree. I'd be interested in learning more about how >> and why Internet protocols work well or badly in emerging >> regions and in suggestions as to what could be done about >> that. That doesn't need bodies in Berlin but would benefit > > That's a general question. It may be easier for the person reading your > message if the question is about a specific protocol. The question > could also be framed in terms of a request for someone from an emerging > region to test an Internet protocol. I'm not sure if a general or more specific question will be better to be honest. Probably the right people are more important than the right question at this stage. > There is a community in Brazil which seems quite active (my guess). As > a start you could get someone to translate your message in Portuguese > and help reach out to them. There may be also be people involved in > open source projects which might be able to help find answers. Well, I don't have a "message" but rather would like to hear from folks in emerging reasons about how well/badly Internet protocols work for them. I doubt trying to translate that query into any specific language is really the next step. I suspect that if there are folks on here that could talk about that, those folks have enough English to do that here. (If not, or uncertain, feel free to contact me off list, I'm happy to try help if there's a specific way in which I can do that.) S. > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > >
- [ericas] Starting the discussion S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Melinda Shore
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion SM
- [ericas] How and why Internet protocols work well… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] How and why Internet protocols work … Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Vinayak Hegde
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion Dhruv Dhody