Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 28 April 2013 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571E521F9A0A for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mFlkdQIrSbVG for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46AD21F9A06 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598D5BE6F; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:46:03 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LacSL63RBHt; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:46:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.10] (unknown [86.46.22.79]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 997F4BE5C; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:46:02 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <517D7C75.4090806@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:45:57 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428091705.0cbc0b60@elandnews.com> <517D755D.8050902@nomountain.net>
In-Reply-To: <517D755D.8050902@nomountain.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] Starting the discussion
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:46:29 -0000

On 04/28/2013 08:15 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 4/28/13 10:55 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> There is the money barrier.  It is very expensive to attend IETF
>> meetings.  It's nearly impossible to get funding probably because the
>> local community does not see any value in the IETF.  There are a few
>> people who may have heard of the IETF.  Some of them have very little
>> understanding of how the IETF works.
> 
> Do you feel that ISOC has a role to play in this?
> 
> I should add that I'm not thrilled with the emphasis on meeting
> attendance as a marker of participation or non-participation.  We
> may not be doing a very good job of communicating how to participate
> in the IETF process without traveling to meetings.

Sort of agree. I'd be interested in learning more about how
and why Internet protocols work well or badly in emerging
regions and in suggestions as to what could be done about
that. That doesn't need bodies in Berlin but would benefit
from that.

S.

> 
> Melinda
>