Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 24 May 2013 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F7521E8082 for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 15:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WwUswMHjWCs for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 15:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C0821E8087 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 15:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.152.207]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4OMUMGa018325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 May 2013 15:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1369434634; bh=cQK3VkIVCYvdA9hcI/NuKosi9FVMJLaNT25nvZK4aqk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Nw6fgUkGiQ5pKnjdeiX53I4pOAeEoeXHkD+JILif98UV8HToshPZ23d3Co1GFP4wD /QdE+Cuzp5c4yjQbZ5uqqTREccp/G9QwXh+n0kSQsNY2IygZVrmR4Uq6Ub57Ee6Y2k zDGvBaTbK3SrBrwbHrPJYfYha+lSeg5axE6iDciw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1369434634; i=@elandsys.com; bh=cQK3VkIVCYvdA9hcI/NuKosi9FVMJLaNT25nvZK4aqk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=R0TBY9B1188K6t1lNc3Ez66W//7oAsjKG6w/GtcdxCB4MkVzMjb5PS85HCcosBWMh XiWUmsvoUHV1Mptmel5xn9NGarwLRqzqLVYCXNDcKlK5pDvZsmQ3KJOKpGNVHVPrq9 3amcqMKoZSJpHToXErqiLMxpY0GQ1edahxxnVrZQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130524143626.0cf072e8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:18:23 -0700
To: Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <519FD460.9050208@braga.eti.br>
References: <519FA104.5020902@braga.eti.br> <6.2.5.6.2.20130524112639.0dc47308@elandnews.com> <519FD460.9050208@braga.eti.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: j@braga.net.br, ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 22:30:47 -0000

Hi Juliao,
At 13:58 24-05-2013, Juliao Braga wrote:
>I think there are a lot of people from LACNIC and from CGI.br / Nic.br
>in this list. The Chair of Brazilian ISOC Chapter is member of CGI.br.

I went through the mail archives for this mailing list.  I saw only 
one person from LACNIC.  I did not see anyone from CGI.br/Nic.br.

>In the next Brazilian Congress of SBC I will try to invite interested
>peoples for BoF about IETF.  And in some especific Symposium, too.

That is a positive initiative.

>IETF could develop a form to send via the mailing list of the SBC, as I
>said. I suppose this is the correct way. If the IETF need help I'm
>available.

As you have attended an IETF meeting you might have noticed that the 
IETF works in an informal way.  In my opinion there isn't a correct 
way.  Vinayak Hegde explained some of the problems that people who do 
not usually speak English encounter and that it is a barrier to 
participation( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79479.html 
).  That barrier will remain as long as the people from, for example, 
the Brazilian Computer Society do not show interest in participating 
in the IETF.  If there is interest an IETF Area Director or someone 
else will try to find a way to help the people from the Brazilian 
Computer Society.

We can discuss about whether it is for the IETF to contact the 
Brazilian Computer Society or you could convince some people from the 
Brazilian Computer Society to comment on this mailing list about the 
problems they face.  I think that having people discussing here would 
be the easier alternative.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy