Re: [ericas] Stuck getting visas for IETF meetings

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 02 May 2013 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32EE21F8B9C for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5qIgE3KdWbY for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:d10:2000:e::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EB621F84F5 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 07:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [186.134.26.236] (helo=[192.168.123.125]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1UXuHz-0000Rv-49; Thu, 02 May 2013 16:15:15 +0200
Message-ID: <518274EA.9040904@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 11:15:06 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicolas Ruiz <nicolas@internettraffic.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130428234454.06a3c160@elandnews.com> <CAKe6YvNcVy15FBWxOe6c4tOBM-FgL3zco56qT2h_O1v5jdVaEA@mail.gmail.com> <A9F64458-DD4D-40EF-BE19-8EA22C2CBA04@tzi.org> <518255DB.9090004@si6networks.com> <518271E6.5000805@internettraffic.com>
In-Reply-To: <518271E6.5000805@internettraffic.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] Stuck getting visas for IETF meetings
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 14:15:18 -0000

On 05/02/2013 11:02 AM, Nicolas Ruiz wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 07:02 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>> On 04/30/2013 06:28 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>>
>>> There is not much we can do about the visa complexity at the IETF level.
>>> But we can do two things:
>>>
>>> -- collect information about relative levels of complexities exhibited
>>>     by different venues.  Right now I would guess (but don't know) that
>>>     it is easier for many to go to Canada than to the US.
>>
>> That's mostly a myth, I would say. In the same way that quite a few
>> times the folks at the Canadian border have been much less polite (if
>> you know what I mean) than at the US border.
> 
> I don't think is a myth. In my experience it's more difficult to be
> granted a visa to visit the US than western Europe.

Wasn't the discussion about "US vs Canada"?


-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492