Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Fri, 24 May 2013 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCC821F962D for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m85GoCzadUq7 for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AEF21F9626 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id id13so3523590vcb.9 for <ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jPcqvLI/3IazeKoe2TcTidCdTbJ68IcEDEmf/Fo17VE=; b=mCAkzTLKc++t/EJh8p6sN9P5mZc4E1tPytxraswB4Gx9PQacyFpXHWrRx+Z40HJv1s 0+kahSSC1fWS23lYzW5fW7VZwKAb5TssALajdQin+e4NQoUXU53FQ8YxPPgaHQp5qfCY hVSbZ3aZ2ZClyvi58NvD1Kfdbosu9pbvtHf9Hr0AkEHyIr/fNSkC7tT3w1b6kab4t4Pe jnJ6fElqMh6mLprGHfdzxnWxlaYrtGlosLPQv4uyRhx8Qjq63ZvigUVxeHe2U10xJQJS 5miTU5+5c/FRKW2QclaTDi3swU6l6GErOK8lDNdxEfzae7EJ0l7VdblZbEG5trG9hZ4f uEBQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.171.135 with SMTP id au7mr8299575vdc.126.1369431675113; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.76.161 with HTTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <519FA407.8010102@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <519FA104.5020902@braga.eti.br> <519FA407.8010102@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:11:14 -0430
Message-ID: <CAOmxzdyyNtRcRVrw1EE-dbNfrNxQGYjqgdZga6yawmeOP6J3uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: j@braga.net.br, Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br>, ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>, <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 21:41:20 -0000

Hi Stephen,

On 5/24/13, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> Hi Julião,
>
> On 05/24/2013 06:19 PM, Juliao Braga wrote:
>> Hello SM,
>>
>> I'd like to remember that the Regional IETF Meetings not necessarily
>> must to have the same format as Annual Meetings. The main concern is
>> that they are (a) motivators for participation in the Annual Meetings,
>> (b) strengthen and give more flexibility in the progress of WG (not that
>> the progress is slow, currently), and (c) encourage participation in
>> Annual Meetings, even remotely, including write drafts, doing reviews as
>> Melinda said.
>
> Isn't that a bit backwards in a sense? The easiest and most
> important form of participation is remote - contributing to
> list discussions, reviewing and authoring drafts. Going to
> meetings is important too, but less so.
>
> Sorry to jump on just this point, but I think its important
> that everyone realise that if you can write good technical
> emails about protocols then you have all you need to be an
> as-fully-paid-up-as-anyone IETF participant.
>

  You are absolutely right, and there are people who have written I+D
and RFCs without attending a single IETF meeting.
  The point here is that if you have a meeting in LATAM it might help
bringing more people to the IETF. Of course it won't be a radical
change and it won't bring 100 people. But at least bringing few people
is just fine.
  Additionally, to attend a meeting, to see the people, to talk with
them makes a big different, after it, it's easier to write emails, to
participate in the IETF community.
  After this discussion started I haven't stop comparing it with the
Olympics games. The Olympics logo (flag) which have 5 interlaces
rings, each of them representing a continent. Until now, after more
than 2000 years LATAM have not has an Olympics games (I know we are
not comparing apples with apples, just a thought)


> Cheers,
> S.
>

Alejandro,

>>
>> Whenever possible I'm talking about the IETF in articles and lectures,
>> as you know. I'm returning to my academic life and therefore will be
>> more effective in spreading within the Brazilian Computer Society (SBC).
>>
>> IETF will create a form and we can ask in the mailing list of SBC (and
>> others). Who knows we can have numbers and others informations?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Julião
>>
>> Em 24/05/2013 11:43, SM escreveu:
>>> Hi Juliao,
>>> At 18:34 23-05-2013, Juliao Braga wrote:
>>>> I stare at the map of where the IETF meetings occurred
>>>> (http://ws.org.br/index.php/IETF_Meetings) and wondering if the fact of
>>>> bringing some of the meetings to below the Equator could lead to
>>>> increase people participation.
>>>
>>> That's a nice map.  It highlights the division between the northern and
>>> southern hemispheres.
>>>
>>>> The answer is always negative. Will not increase participation of more
>>>> people.
>>>>
>>>> Fellowships will help? Certainly not. Resources are finite.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> How then can we increase participation in meetings of the IETF? My
>>>> answer to the question may seem strange: increasing the number of
>>>> annual
>>>> meetings.
>>>
>>> The answer did sound strange at first.  I think that your answer might
>>> be appropriate for a different question.
>>>
>>> At 19:37 23-05-2013, Juliao Braga wrote:
>>>> I think we will have new challenges to be defined. New opportunities
>>>> for
>>>> change that can stimulate, for example, the coming of researchers
>>>> immersed in universities and / or research centers, not yet
>>>> participating in the IETF. Maybe they can not submit drafts, but can
>>>> contribute to foster the knowledge of those who produce drafts or
>>>> working as reviewers. Regarding the participation in discussions of the
>>>> mailing lists, I think that they might be involved with reasonable
>>>> intensity, ideas, and knowledge.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>>> Perhaps the IETF should and can change (not where it has always been a
>>>> success) to capture new people.
>>>
>>> It would take a huge effort to do the above.  A person trying to do it
>>> will make a lot of enemies.
>>>
>>> Do you know people in universities or research centers in South America
>>> who might be interested in contributing their knowledge?  If so, could
>>> you ask them to comment on ericas?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -sm
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
=====
^A.......o$