Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America
Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Fri, 24 May 2013 21:41 UTC
Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ericas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8CCC821F962D for <ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m85GoCzadUq7 for
<ericas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com
[209.85.220.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AEF21F9626 for
<ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id id13so3523590vcb.9 for
<ericas@irtf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=jPcqvLI/3IazeKoe2TcTidCdTbJ68IcEDEmf/Fo17VE=;
b=mCAkzTLKc++t/EJh8p6sN9P5mZc4E1tPytxraswB4Gx9PQacyFpXHWrRx+Z40HJv1s
0+kahSSC1fWS23lYzW5fW7VZwKAb5TssALajdQin+e4NQoUXU53FQ8YxPPgaHQp5qfCY
hVSbZ3aZ2ZClyvi58NvD1Kfdbosu9pbvtHf9Hr0AkEHyIr/fNSkC7tT3w1b6kab4t4Pe
jnJ6fElqMh6mLprGHfdzxnWxlaYrtGlosLPQv4uyRhx8Qjq63ZvigUVxeHe2U10xJQJS
5miTU5+5c/FRKW2QclaTDi3swU6l6GErOK8lDNdxEfzae7EJ0l7VdblZbEG5trG9hZ4f uEBQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.171.135 with SMTP id au7mr8299575vdc.126.1369431675113;
Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.76.161 with HTTP; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <519FA407.8010102@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <519FA104.5020902@braga.eti.br> <519FA407.8010102@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:11:14 -0430
Message-ID: <CAOmxzdyyNtRcRVrw1EE-dbNfrNxQGYjqgdZga6yawmeOP6J3uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: j@braga.net.br, Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br>, ericas@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America
X-BeenThere: ericas@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for \"Emerging Regions Internet Challenges And
Solutions\" \(ERICAS\) " <ericas.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/ericas>,
<mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/ericas>
List-Post: <mailto:ericas@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/ericas>,
<mailto:ericas-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 21:41:20 -0000
Hi Stephen, On 5/24/13, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Hi Julião, > > On 05/24/2013 06:19 PM, Juliao Braga wrote: >> Hello SM, >> >> I'd like to remember that the Regional IETF Meetings not necessarily >> must to have the same format as Annual Meetings. The main concern is >> that they are (a) motivators for participation in the Annual Meetings, >> (b) strengthen and give more flexibility in the progress of WG (not that >> the progress is slow, currently), and (c) encourage participation in >> Annual Meetings, even remotely, including write drafts, doing reviews as >> Melinda said. > > Isn't that a bit backwards in a sense? The easiest and most > important form of participation is remote - contributing to > list discussions, reviewing and authoring drafts. Going to > meetings is important too, but less so. > > Sorry to jump on just this point, but I think its important > that everyone realise that if you can write good technical > emails about protocols then you have all you need to be an > as-fully-paid-up-as-anyone IETF participant. > You are absolutely right, and there are people who have written I+D and RFCs without attending a single IETF meeting. The point here is that if you have a meeting in LATAM it might help bringing more people to the IETF. Of course it won't be a radical change and it won't bring 100 people. But at least bringing few people is just fine. Additionally, to attend a meeting, to see the people, to talk with them makes a big different, after it, it's easier to write emails, to participate in the IETF community. After this discussion started I haven't stop comparing it with the Olympics games. The Olympics logo (flag) which have 5 interlaces rings, each of them representing a continent. Until now, after more than 2000 years LATAM have not has an Olympics games (I know we are not comparing apples with apples, just a thought) > Cheers, > S. > Alejandro, >> >> Whenever possible I'm talking about the IETF in articles and lectures, >> as you know. I'm returning to my academic life and therefore will be >> more effective in spreading within the Brazilian Computer Society (SBC). >> >> IETF will create a form and we can ask in the mailing list of SBC (and >> others). Who knows we can have numbers and others informations? >> >> Regards, >> >> Julião >> >> Em 24/05/2013 11:43, SM escreveu: >>> Hi Juliao, >>> At 18:34 23-05-2013, Juliao Braga wrote: >>>> I stare at the map of where the IETF meetings occurred >>>> (http://ws.org.br/index.php/IETF_Meetings) and wondering if the fact of >>>> bringing some of the meetings to below the Equator could lead to >>>> increase people participation. >>> >>> That's a nice map. It highlights the division between the northern and >>> southern hemispheres. >>> >>>> The answer is always negative. Will not increase participation of more >>>> people. >>>> >>>> Fellowships will help? Certainly not. Resources are finite. >>> >>> Agreed. >>> >>>> How then can we increase participation in meetings of the IETF? My >>>> answer to the question may seem strange: increasing the number of >>>> annual >>>> meetings. >>> >>> The answer did sound strange at first. I think that your answer might >>> be appropriate for a different question. >>> >>> At 19:37 23-05-2013, Juliao Braga wrote: >>>> I think we will have new challenges to be defined. New opportunities >>>> for >>>> change that can stimulate, for example, the coming of researchers >>>> immersed in universities and / or research centers, not yet >>>> participating in the IETF. Maybe they can not submit drafts, but can >>>> contribute to foster the knowledge of those who produce drafts or >>>> working as reviewers. Regarding the participation in discussions of the >>>> mailing lists, I think that they might be involved with reasonable >>>> intensity, ideas, and knowledge. >>> >>> Agreed. >>> >>>> Perhaps the IETF should and can change (not where it has always been a >>>> success) to capture new people. >>> >>> It would take a huge effort to do the above. A person trying to do it >>> will make a lot of enemies. >>> >>> Do you know people in universities or research centers in South America >>> who might be interested in contributing their knowledge? If so, could >>> you ask them to comment on ericas? >>> >>> Regards, >>> -sm >>> >> >> > -- ===== ^A.......o$
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Arturo Servin
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Melinda Shore
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Alejandro Acosta
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Arturo Servin
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Humberto Galiza
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Melinda Shore
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Humberto Galiza
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Melinda Shore
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Eggert, Lars
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Eggert, Lars
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Andy Linton
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Humberto Galiza
- [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF (was: IETF Me… S Moonesamy
- [ericas] Academic participants (was: IETF Meeting… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF (was: IET… Humberto Galiza
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF (was: IET… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF Arturo Servin
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF Arturo Servin
- [ericas] Political aspect (was: IETF Meeting in S… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] Political aspect Stephen Farrell
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF (was: IET… S Moonesamy
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America Juliao Braga
- Re: [ericas] Bringing value to the IETF Juliao Braga