Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list...
G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Tue, 02 April 2019 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2930D1200A4 for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zk-XZBN2JVBK for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BEA120003 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from G-MacBook.local (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1DE91B000A6 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:58:57 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <5CA394D0.6040409@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:58:56 +0100
From: G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: etosat@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR11MB33949B8B0D5B068FF3716F4390560@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR11MB33949B8B0D5B068FF3716F4390560@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/18buzh6JD0WSsFswhRK49FZNWqY>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list...
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:59:03 -0000
Did anyone take a few notes? Gorry On 02/04/2019, 17:42, Border, John wrote: > > FYI – Last Thursday, in Prague, there was a side discussion about > Performance Implications of Path Characteristics. Continued discussion > of the topic will occur on the PANRG mailing list. > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > EToSat mailing list > EToSat@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat
- [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list... Border, John
- Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing li… G Fairhurst
- Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing li… Aaron Falk
- Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing li… Spencer Dawkins at IETF