IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 20 May 2020 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545BF3A08E5 for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fw75A3PIB8DP for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 192783A08C6 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.119] (p548dc699.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.198.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49S3Lt6lx5z1044; Wed, 20 May 2020 21:52:38 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <3e61ab01-13de-9742-e058-8e552828f582@huitema.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 21:52:38 +0200
Cc: "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>, Nitay Argov <Nitay@gilat.com>, Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 611697157.887193-bd6fd8d60c375e705b3c78d53e925066
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9485CBE6-D11D-478E-AD41-E8C56F81746D@tzi.org>
References: <HE1PR0702MB37550F63AB9CDD4FD637CC3EA9BF0@HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <7C07C17B-2A81-4B8A-94E2-87858A5FDDC2@huitema.net> <D369D911-6F31-42D5-844E-7C597EC74CB0@tzi.org> <7ab5eb1c-afc9-0198-2d50-8bccd4872a41@huitema.net> <13D10772-5139-439E-9527-8D72205F0E47@tzi.org> <3e61ab01-13de-9742-e058-8e552828f582@huitema.net>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/4LJi5XhNJzDThn_5Mme5Ph--NHk>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:52:43 -0000

On 2020-05-20, at 20:09, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> 
> middle boxes,

> proxies

I’m not sure we are talking about the same things here, as LOOPS uses neither (it uses routers and tunnels).

But I agree that if there is a 80 % solution in the end-to-end protocol, go for it.

It just isn’t something a network provider can do on their own.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email