Re: [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?

Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> Wed, 13 May 2020 06:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79923A0E16 for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J4q6pg-zrz2u for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.cnes.fr (mx2.cnes.fr [194.199.174.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 504643A0E15 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.73,386,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="34906119"
X-IPAS-Result: A2EfBADblrte/wIBeApmHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQFAgUcCgSNYgQoUgTMKlSqTVIYlgWcLAQEBAQEBAQEBLwgEAQGERAKCKzkFDQIQAQEBBQEBAQEBBQIBAQIChXNMDIZHAgEDLVwCAQgNFSQyJQEBBAESCIMfgX6BDbBQgTQahCABAwIChigGgTiBZYk+gzkma0OCHy4+gkEmAQEDgS0BEgEjg0WCLQSOMIlHgSuJR5AUB4FFgQmCcYUsgXWOPYECgVqIbIRvA40OkCiJX5VnSz1wMxongzVQGJFzAQKHXYVCdDcCBgEHAQEDCY40gRABAQ
X-URL-LookUp-ScanningError: 1
From: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
To: 'Nitay Argov' <Nitay@gilat.com>, "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Packet lost on last mile network?
Thread-Index: AdYo1TE9iC9rJW1SSuiPRhIdLYYFQwAG2ueQ
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:44:43 +0000
Message-ID: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EDA90B0@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
References: <HE1PR0702MB3755B3681DE6B7EA388499BCA9BF0@HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0702MB3755B3681DE6B7EA388499BCA9BF0@HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.100.1062-25416.005
x-tm-as-result: No--29.988900-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EDA90B0TWMBXP03cnesnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/AH4JWWPINWsAsMmKlsOgGtF6SY8>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:44:56 -0000

Hi,

IMHO, you are not missing much, there is an issue when you have a lossy end-user delivery network (unless QUIC supports an unreliable transmission).
Moreover, you may also have congestion losses in the aggregation network of the satellite system.
To consider this issue, we have proposed a specific use-case in the QUIC4SAT draft : https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuhn-quic-4-sat-04
There are multiple ways of solving this issue: adding coding in QUIC (draft-swett-nwcrg-coding-for-quic-04), enabling local retransmissions (e.g. with MASQUE approach) or having an "aggressive" congestion control that ignore loss as a congestion signal, etc.
There are also some IETF presentations on this issue:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-panrg-quic-over-in-sequence-paths-with-different-characteristics-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-panrg-quic-over-satellite-00

I hope this helps,

Nico

De : EToSat <etosat-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de Nitay Argov
Envoyé : mercredi 13 mai 2020 05:28
À : etosat@ietf.org
Objet : [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?

Hi,
I'm looking for discussions on issues related to a satellite network that is used with a lossy end-user delivery network - e.g. WiFi. As far as I understand, once QUIC is used, any packet drop by the user network will need to be retransmitted over the satellite? Doesn't this pose a real problem for using QUIC over such networks?
Am I missing something? I am sure this issue was discussed in the past but I could not find where.
Thanks!
IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments is intended for the above named addressee(s), and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender immediately and delete this email: you should not copy or use this e-mail for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any person.