Re: [EToSat] New Version Notification for draft-lhan-problems-requirements-satellite-net-02.txt

[Arashmid Akhavain <[e-mail]>]

Interesting scenario! Thank you for pointing it out Raymond.

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 3:44 PM Raymond Burkholder <[e-mail]>
wrote:

>
> On 2022-02-23 1:36 p.m., Arashmid Akhavain wrote:
> > That could be another alternative.
> > The question that I have been struggling with is whether and how
> > satellite networks can benefit from standardisations. These networks
> > are proprietary (at least for the time being). It is difficult to
> > imagine satellites in a multi-vendor ecosystem.
>
> In the not too distant future (as in, it is being worked on right now),
> some operators will be carrying the traffic of other operators.  ie,
> backbone operators in the sky will have a good foot print of ground
> stations, and will be providing backbone operations to satellite
> operators who don't have a large ground footprint (this is the sky to
> sky to ground scenario, vs the broadband up-down scenario).
>
> There then needs to be some sort of interoperability of the carrier vs
> the end-user in terms of how to get a endnode-satellite's data
> encapsulated across a carrier's satellite network down to the ground and
> then over to the subscriber's site in a real-time fashion.
>
> >
> > That's why I asked what the authors of this draft intended to do.
> >
> > Arashmid
> >
>
>