Re: [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?

Nitay Argov <Nitay@gilat.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <Nitay@gilat.com>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E333A0C52 for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gilatsatnet.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sIkU-56ktS5C for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-AM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am6eur05on2040.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.22.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0773A0C51 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FmcTYOva7A2da2NXmEBKeBY+8Oi4CmRxewPnmmg8u6kDaTHR6/WuxGQ2QvRWNb6Z/JRWaM/iD/J18wwrdeDb4Zro0Y4LkiDr55HVNN54UwhOZO2BmSKY5gjiNcBNnh10q9QW35wCqy0VYbqO8bAN+lRVRYIjOY5CxJ2jbaUv+D7LPYN0e/Yg9/H6W+X40vZ5NgygYENeqRUMR7OsJBZ/dyiv12S3Z53TcwpzBU4Py5a2tZ9ymK60S5dHjpbuXGr23MU31P9Z5bB0rnTifJHWhoYfD2/YWJzvqKB+c/VZfNNWUGnXnXKS9HT4wnsMDObWeeTPvPMDMSKK2RQdd0SXyQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RBjw/wOHijUNd/Bjx3ZPLOtSjf2Cg5A/LpUnPzAi77o=; b=Vqyd2FUaWH2p6iw5/y1VvELEPbhT3tj0aSqODzmm4gNLprcdhONUcr1QaFEEiJ9i4yXLxT+V00uzvsAFLMGPcKIwSWO5xnY7N7hkgf88VHYe89Rint+8ThZ6t5/cKovExACT6r7I4QDAh4ywIrrS4TiRtjxWGrH7O69USS0G2/1n7qLuxg+n1cV3J+7YFi+wWPs/jTCmgxPyK2yAHwl65gk4747hQHIqe16+yErkhNfqW9fb9TKbuj51DoGQsTawWct/qbPu2Mysi2BU6QVMxpCgmd4jLqqLAlSDeVXCKB+SNQKtjGZ/2HvcUHNOhZl4cNW0jRbF6d+lTjVwapzuaQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gilat.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gilat.com; dkim=pass header.d=gilat.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gilatsatnet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-gilatsatnet-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RBjw/wOHijUNd/Bjx3ZPLOtSjf2Cg5A/LpUnPzAi77o=; b=gVkQXPQuKdePWHhQCiiaoxBwtvN2dF0eTHHBMrRA8b4BGEi05n0fPpZlikxWskBpw7o1D4YLR9wlSfW++JDurYNj+IvCnIeQ1HtgdCWk6Ig4oICwZtkwkRZ0VYZ4wLUvgGGF59gY22qzAkHKsnBvRQK/b6ZJhS0k2yowU16gFLA=
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:8d::33) by HE1PR0702MB3708.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:7:8c::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.14; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:52:48 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c584:c421:871e:617d]) by HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c584:c421:871e:617d%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2979.033; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:52:48 +0000
From: Nitay Argov <Nitay@gilat.com>
To: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>, "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Packet lost on last mile network?
Thread-Index: AdYo1TE9iC9rJW1SSuiPRhIdLYYFQwAG2ueQAACYqaA=
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:52:47 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0702MB37550F63AB9CDD4FD637CC3EA9BF0@HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR0702MB3755B3681DE6B7EA388499BCA9BF0@HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EDA90B0@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
In-Reply-To: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EDA90B0@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US, he-IL
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cnes.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cnes.fr; dmarc=none action=none header.from=gilat.com;
x-originating-ip: [91.228.163.90]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 34b13c7d-8579-48b6-73fe-08d7f70a3f55
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR0702MB3708:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0702MB370806D49A8E4E347047ADA6A9BF0@HE1PR0702MB3708.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0402872DA1
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HE1PR0702MB3755.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(39850400004)(366004)(376002)(346002)(33430700001)(86362001)(53546011)(76116006)(66446008)(66946007)(5660300002)(64756008)(66476007)(8676002)(66556008)(478600001)(2906002)(110136005)(71200400001)(8936002)(316002)(166002)(966005)(55016002)(26005)(6506007)(186003)(33656002)(33440700001)(9686003)(52536014)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR0702MB37550F63AB9CDD4FD637CC3EA9BF0HE1PR0702MB3755_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: gilat.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 34b13c7d-8579-48b6-73fe-08d7f70a3f55
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 May 2020 06:52:47.9293 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 7300b1a3-573a-4010-92a6-1c65cd85e927
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: q2mDRF0FmcgTgzzy7CiE+hiZzU7pit3O19p5CsVVFxsqLXvqU1gLnaSLBxcnRdMx
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0702MB3708
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/QQ485KdZIV_rG4rGa_xAllO6hvs>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:52:54 -0000

Thanks!!
I will study the suggested resources.

From: Kuhn Nicolas [mailto:Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr]
Sent: יום ד 13 מאי 2020 09:45
To: Nitay Argov <Nitay@gilat.com>om>; etosat@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Packet lost on last mile network?

Hi,

IMHO, you are not missing much, there is an issue when you have a lossy end-user delivery network (unless QUIC supports an unreliable transmission).
Moreover, you may also have congestion losses in the aggregation network of the satellite system.
To consider this issue, we have proposed a specific use-case in the QUIC4SAT draft : https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuhn-quic-4-sat-04<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-kuhn-quic-4-sat-04&data=02%7C01%7CNitay%40gilat.com%7C1a1932285f114bf8688308d7f70922c6%7C7300b1a3573a401092a61c65cd85e927%7C0%7C0%7C637249490926514767&sdata=KCAaxn7ksxIBuMPDzAvSMJ0WIZKpPk%2FdUa5Sz15P3Vo%3D&reserved=0>
There are multiple ways of solving this issue: adding coding in QUIC (draft-swett-nwcrg-coding-for-quic-04), enabling local retransmissions (e.g. with MASQUE approach) or having an “aggressive” congestion control that ignore loss as a congestion signal, etc.
There are also some IETF presentations on this issue:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-panrg-quic-over-in-sequence-paths-with-different-characteristics-00<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fmeeting%2F105%2Fmaterials%2Fslides-105-panrg-quic-over-in-sequence-paths-with-different-characteristics-00&data=02%7C01%7CNitay%40gilat.com%7C1a1932285f114bf8688308d7f70922c6%7C7300b1a3573a401092a61c65cd85e927%7C0%7C0%7C637249490926514767&sdata=aHwqMqos3IwCuw3bCHBjV8ZgeOYbz2XcHHs7XbN9f1g%3D&reserved=0>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-panrg-quic-over-satellite-00<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fmeeting%2F105%2Fmaterials%2Fslides-105-panrg-quic-over-satellite-00&data=02%7C01%7CNitay%40gilat.com%7C1a1932285f114bf8688308d7f70922c6%7C7300b1a3573a401092a61c65cd85e927%7C0%7C0%7C637249490926524767&sdata=9v71nkMR%2FvpY%2BJi8zyaX8H6nixVnhx8yfKjWz7HYG2E%3D&reserved=0>

I hope this helps,

Nico

De : EToSat <etosat-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:etosat-bounces@ietf.org>> De la part de Nitay Argov
Envoyé : mercredi 13 mai 2020 05:28
À : etosat@ietf.org<mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
Objet : [EToSat] Packet lost on last mile network?

Hi,
I'm looking for discussions on issues related to a satellite network that is used with a lossy end-user delivery network – e.g. WiFi. As far as I understand, once QUIC is used, any packet drop by the user network will need to be retransmitted over the satellite? Doesn't this pose a real problem for using QUIC over such networks?
Am I missing something? I am sure this issue was discussed in the past but I could not find where.
Thanks!
IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments is intended for the above named addressee(s), and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender immediately and delete this email: you should not copy or use this e-mail for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any person.
IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments is intended for the above named addressee(s), and may contain information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender immediately and delete this email: you should not copy or use this e-mail for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any person.