Re: [EToSat] about LOOPS(Localized Optimization of Path Segments) and etosat

[Marie-Jose Montpetit <[e-mail]>]

The files also refer to the nwcrg on-going work. It is a common practice to run coded (FEC) sessions over tunnels to isolate the effects of coding across paths. And we have work on nw coding over satellite also. Would this group be open for me to send this thread over to our list?

Also in the COIN proposed RG we are also looking at per hop optimization but in the context of in-network computing (and that includes FEC, transcoding, pre-fetching, data decompostion etc.) which I can see are also related. So I could copy there too.

Thanks for copying me.

mjm


Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[phone]
@SocialTVMIT



> On Jan 3, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Border, John <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Clearly LOOPS should not focus only on satellite.  But, I think LOOPS is directly relevant to ETOSAT.  Techniques like LOOPS are likely to be a key part of the solution to the performance over satellite problem.
> 
> I will be sending out an email to ETOSAT in the next couple of days to try to kickstart discussion overall.
> 
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> 
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 5:59 PM
> To: Border, John <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Liyizhou <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: about LOOPS(Localized Optimization of Path Segments) and etosat
> 
> WARNING: The sender of this email could not be validated and may not match the person in the "From" field.
> 
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> WARNING: The sender of this email could not be validated and may not match the person in the "From" field.
> 
> Hi John,
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 10:37, Liyizhou <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> I copied to Carsten who was leading the side meeting. He might provide more information.
> 
> As Yizhou said, there are no formal minutes of this side meeting, but I did record my impressions in the attached short summary.  I have also attached the slides that we used, as the summary may not be comprehensible without those.
> 
> Given that Spencer specifically asked us to discuss this in the context of etosat, it would certainly help to know what the intentions were in creating this list and to speculate a bit how a potential etosat activity might cross-pollinate with LOOPS.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> <Summary of the IETF103 LOOPS side meeting, 2018-11-06.pdf><LOOPS.pdf>