[EToSat] Path-wise congestion control with MASQUE as replacement for PEPs?
Joerg Deutschmann <joerg.deutschmann@fau.de> Tue, 21 April 2020 09:07 UTC
Return-Path: <joerg.deutschmann@fau.de>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342443A09AE; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fau.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lj_IYqp0UWVJ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-rz-1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (mx-rz-1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:1025::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E19323A09A9; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-rz-smart.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (mx-rz-smart.rrze.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:1025::1e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-rz-1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 495yPP2Grwz8sYd; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fau.de; s=fau-2013; t=1587460025; bh=y4BhUiMStuW6BuHExhai7yVlTC4+fKe+ECSwcaWkzJs=; h=To:Cc:From:Subject:Date:From:To:CC:Subject; b=dAXOz9Y2ugQxw/DbLXaCBBEHa9NN1CJBQ206PjolyjoECzEDL8g+S6SfjzY3coTry hMRWvUX+5FF8o71e2Xg4bIn1mUssN3qKU4kjaybEbdT2eXQgYQ/MEgtcAvVAm51wsI 5g5iicqUG1gA5utEjdC3b/3s9VrHBKD/hnpQTJcWMtll4ax4v8otf+fBIfOof9BPKo A16+kQZhvpk6lrTaKZmNWwLFX13l4Nlft7QNj/e00z8MmRMf/IYHW7VtSev14t4OSM 2Xl3RpypP0r+FxDNb2lOiEXXQlpHaxWUmWhL+alMiAzOjJiEHMKMqTZRbRTkqiNRPf 6jv2pbnniYxdg==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boeck1.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (RRZE)
X-RRZE-Flag: Not-Spam
X-RRZE-Submit-IP: 131.188.37.210
Received: from faui7s0.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui7s0.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.37.210]) by mailhub.rrze.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495yPL4Rzfz8sYl; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:07:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.58] (x5f736eb5.dyn.telefonica.de [95.115.110.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by faui7s0.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53DE340BC877; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:07:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: masque@ietf.org
Cc: etosat@ietf.org
From: Joerg Deutschmann <joerg.deutschmann@fau.de>
Message-ID: <66f5e8e0-a57c-2f60-9d82-ee188dc95d9e@fau.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:06:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020208070605010807090708"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/s_hYuK-nzFZZE-XlyiV-oDlZNi8>
Subject: [EToSat] Path-wise congestion control with MASQUE as replacement for PEPs?
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:07:12 -0000
Dear MASQUE list,
could MASQUE provide path-wise congestion control, something like this
(more fancy drawing attached):
MASQUE
Server
Client <------##########------##########------> Server
^ ^ ^
quic end2end quic
tunnel quic tunnel
sat cc datagrams any cc
Other than classical VPNs, the outer tunnels would take care of the flow
and congestion control. Such a setup could replace the Split TCP
Performance Enhancement Proxies used in satellite networks.
Best regards
Joerg
--
Computer Science, Chair for Computer Networks and Communication Systems
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Martensstr. 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
e-mail: joerg.deutschmann@fau.de
phone: +49-9131-8527914
- [EToSat] Path-wise congestion control with MASQUE… Joerg Deutschmann
- Re: [EToSat] [Masque] Path-wise congestion contro… Marcus Ihlar
- Re: [EToSat] [Masque] Path-wise congestion contro… Joerg Deutschmann