Re: [EToSat] [QUIC performance and SATCOM]

[Joerg Deutschmann <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

thanks for the link to this interesting paper. We did some related work, 
which you might be interested in. It will be presented at the NetSys 
2019 conference [1]. A version is available at [2].

While your "QUIC and SATCOM" paper provides more details regarding 
HTTP/2 vs. QUIC, we took a broader view. We measured page load times 
over HTTP(S)/1.1 and HTTP/2, with and without VPNs. Additionally we set 
up two Quic servers (Chromium QUIC and quic-go). All tests were run with 
three different satellite internet providers, showing quite some 
differences...

Best regards,
Joerg

[1] www.netsys2019.org
[2] www7content.cs.fau.de/~deutschmann/NetSys2019_preprint.pdf





On 09.11.18 04:35, Kuhn Nicolas wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> We have recently posted on ArXiv an article on QUIC and its performance 
> over a GEO SATCOM link.
> 
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04970.pdf
> 
> This paper has been presented at IETF 103 @MAPRG 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/agenda-103-maprg-00
> 
> The code used to run these experiments is available, so do not hesitate 
> to contact us if you want to reproduce our experiments.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Ludovic Thomas (ISAE-SUPAERO), Emmanuel Dubois (CNES), Nicolas Kuhn 
> (CNES), Emmanuel Lochin (ISAE-SUPAERO)
>