IETF Logo Mail Archive

[EToSat] [QUIC performance and SATCOM]

Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> Fri, 09 November 2018 03:35 UTC

Return-Path: <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A8F126DBF for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:35:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JonIM4s7hOey for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.cnes.fr (mx1.cnes.fr [194.199.174.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD67A1277BB for <etosat@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:35:23 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,481,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="3722715"
X-IPAS-Result: A2EkAADc/+Rb/wIBeApkHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBUQcBAQsBgQ2BXIEpCowGnQSCYoVUFIFmIBCESQKDOzQNDQEDAQEBAQEBAgICgQUBC4VAL14BFRVWIQUBBBuDGoEdc6lCGoQTAQMCAoVsBYJ+hReFe4ERRoVnAgECgSY6gzOCJgKOa5BdBwKBCoVohHuFQV2JCwOHAY0gjBOCDjMaJ4M4ixyFPnIBjDCBHwEB
From: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
To: "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [QUIC performance and SATCOM]
Thread-Index: AdR33OWxM2LvnAfwSGm7WuIUjAfF8w==
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 03:35:13 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:34:29 +0000
Message-ID: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF176933C4@TW-MBX-P02.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.100.1062-24212.004
x-tm-as-result: No--17.936600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF176933C4TWMBXP02cnesnet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/zDzl2qk9ncGnmSCWd7pG1VkPEI0>
Subject: [EToSat] [QUIC performance and SATCOM]
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 03:35:27 -0000

Dear all,

We have recently posted on ArXiv an article on QUIC and its performance over a GEO SATCOM link.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04970.pdf

This paper has been presented at IETF 103 @MAPRG https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/agenda-103-maprg-00
The code used to run these experiments is available, so do not hesitate to contact us if you want to reproduce our experiments.

Kind regards,

Ludovic Thomas (ISAE-SUPAERO), Emmanuel Dubois (CNES), Nicolas Kuhn (CNES), Emmanuel Lochin (ISAE-SUPAERO)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email