IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EToSat] Side-meeting on QUIC over high BDP ?

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1BD12002E for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:40:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03Z02FSHwk4A for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:40:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 995871200A4 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:40:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id q28so12457379lfa.5 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:40:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S2+WgfOqsS9FkmwQ1U6clHNqLRHMBxHE2pws/vk19dA=; b=bmvq6VBBZIYZRd4eo8v5MTGpta/xjz/wz/R5XYes2Fqx4lMeOoQgszLRTkkOIuOop4 MIzcUGVi5GJK+AfYAt2M+sPEvY/OSQBwSoRRgEqAUkmfCAw/VA8Pn9go50zyDGBdsK38 slRTs/YqQZLaltD5cfiGPWw7Cn8JMce6ClbvL8sHpgqvgt4L0pPpA9hvoZbzzdDWeTRh K8AsCUTGWFfUF9Wh3pMpabk5YhLaqaIjaUnKRh+df/VPmGVt3AS8cw7j7PS4CqTSj50y KCc8wHGTu4wLTU2ySlpya4/Bilndo0aOCKEoTFRFQmJ8MowNqX0WXYepdWMisLH+cxaV 09sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S2+WgfOqsS9FkmwQ1U6clHNqLRHMBxHE2pws/vk19dA=; b=E/pF5bi/NynA/jl2WjwaZeDLsUtjqp2ltcMt2Ae51cC1klTbhJ4JpRL5JeCu8uS/wU FCxzEttNsY6lJ3FL779VOvCHu1SMa6ZPaJAADeE3QzCm+9sdbeskmG0C1jcNfi0p/zuE GCkXNhF2UlrNDKE7YQYEr9Qhdx1dHmvnjrrX7NLnEU9OmOrE20qJg/Qo9fjYBjmBqAjg BCa/cN2ayV65U6jWHVqHdRHaXc2/mYbeXD1+XN24d2p4TnfVZ1RAroeTfdJSjOUy/PJo +mzsk5D+WCxiVJK0pBl1O+s4mmapcpIzGcp0DnbM5khhacbFpg0KFWKcyEh8r2yBivK1 jHmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwLd7vSU8MlX5hHbrW2hPv3rypE9dzw2leQbDeO7UG0lCbz+oK WNcqH7nsIn0OjStnkfkcumCpk3Zqu4A9jr2NbwI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzM1jD7/TDYMGmWPxxcxinjTKNDVo6HjZHhA5SntfsgmlnsuDjP1EBBqIOIw1YGjp25FgQKNFzFVCNm2TohCPc=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:8582:: with SMTP id h124mr5319644lfd.64.1572878450710; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 06:40:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1ECA0946@TW-MBX-P02.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
In-Reply-To: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1ECA0946@TW-MBX-P02.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 08:40:24 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eds5GymrXneN-nyKNzTU+Obhf9s=RcAPV0_OHNNW6hyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
Cc: "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "Border, John" <John.Border@hughes.com>, "emile.stephan@orange.com" <emile.stephan@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000545f130596864db9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/zMB-HTiav639XoYIXPR8y4BUmhY>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] Side-meeting on QUIC over high BDP ?
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 14:40:55 -0000

Hi, Nicolas,

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:12 AM Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are planning a side-meeting at next IETF on “Performance evaluation of
> QUIC in various environments”.
>
> The main idea is to gather people evaluating QUIC when it comes to exploit
> paths with various characteristics – with a slight focus for high BDP
> networks.
>
>
>
> Evaluations of QUIC over satellite has been presented in multiple IETF
> sessions [1-5], but a dedicated session would enable to gather whoever is
> interested in this activity.
>
>
>
> Is anyone interested in presenting experimental results and/or attend such
> meeting ?
>

I'm very interested in attending such a side meeting.

Thanks!

Spencer


> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Nico, on the behalf of John, Gorry and Emile
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-maprg-quic-and-satcom-nicolas-kuhn-01
>
> [2]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/slides-104-maprg-satellite-internet-performance-measurements-jorg-deutschmann-01
>
> [3]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-maprg-measuring-quic-dynamics-over-a-high-delay-path-01
>
> [4]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-panrg-quic-over-satellite-00
>
> [5]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-panrg-quic-over-in-sequence-paths-with-different-characteristics-00
> _______________________________________________
> EToSat mailing list
> EToSat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email