Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F073A0823 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=X0CYRuTm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=vDb5Nnt6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HB1cCm0B8lpr for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6DA3A081D for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2095C0095 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:54:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=rmViSV0 stGhecAfK+ohe9exQn7ldr1XXr6iyJvvnhj8=; b=X0CYRuTmxa8+1k8zL6TL9Pi Phg705CFrMuVNkDE/FyRWIGwm0fF+kJKNPxI7r6MLNeJQM93DUxwBoAZrUtny1TT RNaqRpA/220aIRzZKwSM1IjLT2uqNtu4ppZjhxrmkpcL8zJN99A7jI3ILHa++ExQ mJ/oml8482U/IbDF/K27rzylW62ebpFsABHXnEOq1HCMWmefIU4r+CVFb3GKqLA9 dcRZlvERBvbUqAP91zWDQ66Zv4Y4UKqZ9P43LC862j6wwHWxcNpSK8TFrDWVqsvV +4wmOjF5wfvqDjDha12J88wEM75zub9z28ETpbOo6kY6WUzpTNePzGw8v5NnJ4A= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=rmViSV 0stGhecAfK+ohe9exQn7ldr1XXr6iyJvvnhj8=; b=vDb5Nnt6wb/ltJY+erZpUg jqDw92Ssmjbp/cNubczqVLaSZ9skIc960tMP10h+oDnNGfSNQH33d1aSJnzq1Qxa L+8GL0vc7oStgtZc5sKrd56F/zHlLhNo00O7M0TTb/kCw8izhDKjJ15LdKWsm0Cp fUGAT/jwwWe47lDIoN/gxDCFiZgrduC+6BY0SzucSTvkbeIp+49F1YPPKbFAM/V8 U5PlUcefxSiAsTDpBlkZbeqCtrWq9YISA4ifRtnpS7vtfkR99RsH5ZWfMsQtXt4p E188uDTOLIDS7Plk5liQRs/h03Itzxh4oiUDiL8V23N1F/hkjBDTJ5+43uBAVqeQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:A9jgXmaznrwk-EIs5gFAkv8PugI_3jGysvl-HcQrMiTWB2fkOAF0Tg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehiedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhnucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghes fhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffveefiefgje evteehheelgeetleetveeguedthfehgffhtdejhfdvhefhtdekgfenucffohhmrghinhep ihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:A9jgXpYivgKAk8URhmkARASdJg89UsYqN_oO1h0VlvtSH8yfezBs9w> <xmx:A9jgXg_Wr-tR6w7jbxQbsgUppP8YB0VvlR1MJcmF5HjihrVBb7UgUA> <xmx:A9jgXooK5_DSfFUxBtThzerXzVv51dVrJIIgEmxGtp2Q-Lj9X0EjFQ> <xmx:A9jgXu6TJb3m-W3lk_C_nnPgMW90QnnVGdIvUuOzZ9ODuZyeZ6rUig>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 31B9F180091; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:54:27 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-525-ge8fa799-fm-20200609.001-ge8fa7990
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <b6189f84-c09a-4052-8c90-692d0a490a6d@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f4090e79-3157-4c8a-bf79-6cfaf0bfccb3@dogfood.fastmail.com>
References: <9d20f8a5-9441-47ba-b2f3-c2ee87f97a81@dogfood.fastmail.com> <345bfd7c-f16e-c9b2-1697-da66929086d0@isode.com> <f4090e79-3157-4c8a-bf79-6cfaf0bfccb3@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:54:07 +1000
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=eefb305272094ca8adc2611302fdffe4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/11S4pDJwWCMhB2_uHqKjucnSsWI>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:54:31 -0000

Er, 100 minute. I can't maths.

Bron.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, at 22:53, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, at 22:50, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> Hi Bron,

>> On 06/06/2020 07:41, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>> Hi Extra-ordinary people,
>>> 
>>> We have an interim meeting scheduled in a couple of weeks, where we'll be mostly talking about IMAP4rev2 I'm sure. We need to decide BEFORE then whether we will also be meeting at the IETF108 virtual meeting in not-Madrid.
>>> 
>>> Does anybody have a strong opinion on this? I'm inclined not to take up a time slot unless people thing there's valuable work which is better done during the official IETF108 times. I'll be attending anyway because I plan to run a JMAP session, but I feel that EXTRA has less need to meet during a virtual IETF.
>>> 
>>> Let me know, pretty much if anyone thinks it's going to be worth having the session I'll ask for it - they're always a pleasant way to spend some time.
>> I think it will really depend on what actions items we come up after the EXTRA session next week and AD review of IMAP4rev2.

>> Maybe ask for a shared slot between JMAP and EXTRA?

>> Best Regards,

>> Alexey

> 
> I currently have a 50 min slot for JMAP - I could extend that to ask for a 140 min slot instead for both!
> 
> Bron.
> 
> --
>  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>  brong@fastmailteam.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
> 

--
 Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
 brong@fastmailteam.com