Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-03: (with COMMENT)

Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83E3120258; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xPVpb2mq0Mek; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF04212020A; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9DF6A25F; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1554955169; bh=KkI4B8Y/5LZz1H+Decg8RD43Fh4Cel5eRH37sOEZCsw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=8U2GXC17ZrwI19C0H1rJ3Cb8qUsJNvwYAPqA8jMdt2lrfFBkr/JZBmvz7RgdwObLk S1VTbwZNw1M4YEc4WgB1QXYrQX0UX3tICWjULcqp89ycfsjZcak92yqpBJ2lmncbH6 YMUwjAvcGSmbFLXYu7a19h+N7Xn9vI0U/otGuwTzZ/QzMkuAyJwZ55jA3riC33xOla T4iwa3B4SjkBkzBdR0EkpA80aVwVFAdG+LkhIsfQCE+25PGxmIWH+Jq5buOOVQkLfO IP7Gep7RkxixKLjDgavAg61HZUCcZOJkT8c3bPSfdFa7fd7HL/grNjbq7Jxa8zj9O5 2dUjFgtouHCdA==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 229C83C0066; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:59:28 -0600 (MDT)
From: Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com, extra-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview@ietf.org
Message-ID: <168198734.18032.1554955169064@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <155491399722.9512.11002649582098559943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <155491399722.9512.11002649582098559943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev10
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/36wYvU6ozZ3B6Ecl1au21lxgczs>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 03:59:33 -0000

Alissa,

Thanks for your comment.  See below.

> On April 10, 2019 at 10:33 AM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In Section 4.1, I suggest s/The FUZZY algorithm/The FUZZY algorithm identifier/
> (since it doesn't refer to an actual algorithm)

I think the better revision might be to take out the word "identifier" (or replace it with "list") in Section 3.1.

I don't think there's confusion as to what "algorithm" is referring to in the context of the document, although we should be consistent in its usage throughout.

michael