Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 04 February 2021 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2813A0C23; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:38:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Zru2fdxsrfs; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com [209.85.208.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC3A3A0BED; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id e18so4361379lja.12; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:38:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GQMsmmbqWosChudZxnX6nxB2cYy1Wp5xU44MBiee2P8=; b=ki/IaX1sJlwxjuegoy3fryxOyAEAnkDzewO9up/PtCjfK3TUxRieicDtSqfHU61oKo fySVUD/KjK5nFEecSTBRmy+iqoRcl8YOwa1fvKwt/r3v5HFKDNGyENiLfsrlZrWGBV+Z b7IrKRN5DY7A7lvg/RzMR9irdiDdlQrYxChQe4kCdKSuGViG/jucPaNhEpeMEk2tNNoo XOEH/LQgqGdj9M+2lBPM/6YBNXLRISzSj/6VwebKKtmKE1hScif59tM9RDlnY6HfVExz RrZqnJGt3puZHxm+LpS1C9qq8JKO7E4WFlz5di4v6pcq+VOggZ6Zipjsl6ZqDdjJB+IE 9izA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5312v91kP8Vib1DOizhbqaWA/lG+bsq1HCQLWnLsy7uUyzrAR4Iy FLc7RK0mrneFRk+DmfaWKspLdfbbCP7wRmD08Bo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz39Xeck0DoUkQ7URa6p4MNGDG6nSaOnO21JtdKypOR5bW+rkBi+PaMUcR/eID22WgogbVdB/ZxkoMj7xTCqRY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:959a:: with SMTP id w26mr261748ljh.113.1612460299130; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:38:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161228843386.9750.10522178607825201429@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJqMMR4er0Qz+pccOEKe0+F+ABiBSijifOyc3dK7ZqvhA@mail.gmail.com> <9D024588-53BA-47AD-9AFD-46E2E9C350BD@cooperw.in> <CALaySJLNnD0gJyjsMjQODC_vKLFQPJMf_oBnfp_hS2nrSD+2Tg@mail.gmail.com> <470EB1D6-0D84-4DC2-A483-56F9B9C76DA3@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <470EB1D6-0D84-4DC2-A483-56F9B9C76DA3@cooperw.in>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:38:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CALaySJKms8fXb=skNfXNCVf1o0uwaQZ10Aj1a+sdyZuN4-eV_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/3Y6jzbs3YTmI577LmAvQST2Q-ZA>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:38:23 -0000
> > Do you think it's worth the risk of introducing errors (point 1)?
>
> I’m not sure I understand it well enough. If you substitute values that are the same length in
> characters as the old values, is this still a problem? I.e., if you padded examples with numbers
> ("example123456”) or something along those lines, does that help?
That sounds workable; I don't think we have any digital signatures,
which would still break, but I don't think we need to worry about
that. Let me talk it over with Alexey.
Thanks, Alissa.
Barry
- [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-iet… Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Alexey Melnikov