[Extra] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I also have a minor comment on this sentence:

"If the specified
   mailbox doesn't exist, the implementation MUST file the message into
   the user's main mailbox (e.g.  IMAP "INBOX")."

Beside the conflict Ekr mentioned, I'm wondering why this is a MUST. I guess
the other option would be to not copy it anywhere (and file an error message to
the user). I'm not an expert on mail at all but as a user I would find it
confusing to find such messages in my INBOX. However, if there is a good reason
that it must be ensured that such a message is stored, I guess that's the only
viable default option.