Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-15.txt

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 15 September 2020 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082333A100A for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pw_BYjyJiKT5 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B5B3A1005 for <extra@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 07:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1600179843; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=6A/wVd0BT3Z2dKfA7R82az54IRjlJLPq2FkH7t5dpwM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=CzLhf/bw1l/vKYSqKJS6XIk/ARAUl8HJ/uowb0VEUbAqF5zTf4E7VYAPSUh5mVqmKS+h9t GU+TxyExF2svYIept/zFxqAr0ekTt8jm0aen5W0+3rP7TEenRWbNtDhhbRJX4ZQJBYdMJU 1Aooiz26rJ69UxS1fxyFf6q5ysskFak=;
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (97e1f4dd.skybroadband.com [151.225.244.221]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <X2DOggAJfYDN@waldorf.isode.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:24:03 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: Stephan Bosch <stephan.bosch@open-xchange.com>
References: <159238763595.1803.574245566610096074@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4390473-241f-6860-2ebb-fdf4dad06ec8@isode.com> <a7304716-b160-4731-e145-934cb127d28e@open-xchange.com> <b908d009-5ee4-9caa-63ea-23788a270188@open-xchange.com> <de1f23c9-5516-91d7-039e-9354ce73ffea@isode.com> <66611b2f-e1aa-1609-f296-4b4f5db92bbb@open-xchange.com>
Cc: extra@ietf.org
Message-ID: <042edcae-36f9-c061-b7e7-822e8456b82e@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:23:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
In-Reply-To: <66611b2f-e1aa-1609-f296-4b4f5db92bbb@open-xchange.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/BFB-GHbxCXDOy_OYFyoWd6WHUIc>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-15.txt
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:24:06 -0000

Hi Stephan,

On 02/09/2020 21:06, Stephan Bosch wrote:

> Hi Alexey,
>
> On 29/07/2020 17:55, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
  [snip]
>>>> section-12.1:
>>>>
>>>>    As this specification revises the AUTH= prefix, STARTTLS and
>>>>    LOGINDISABLED extensions previously defined in [IMAP-TLS], IANA is
>>>>    requested to update registry entries for these 3 extensions to 
>>>> point
>>>>    to this document.
>>>> -> This is not noted in the document header.
>>
>> Can you explain what is the issue with this text? Are you talking 
>> about documents listed as Updated/Obsolete?
>
> Yes.

Actually, I think if I drop "previously defined in [IMAP-TLS]", then no 
further changes are needed. There is no reason to "update" IMAP-TLS 
document, as it was already updated once by RFC 3501.


Best Regards,

Alexey