Re: [Extra] Fwd: Personnel change for extra WG

"Bron Gondwana" <> Wed, 03 April 2019 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F674120402 for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=Uq8hWDy0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=U7JyKDAR
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1I5pNar3gElj for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5EF12042A for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal []) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3542262D9 for <>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 22:10:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap7 ([]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 22:10:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=yUD9vuT /PayhFyRYW9NkMQ7WnhhgskMYtOj2gsYXFSM=; b=Uq8hWDy0XuiX6qcJmidDthR qKd5P9Dbkk5DwDy4mgLmfUOywJgrXBOOVCxUplXL6kZXEfWhoEtcuh9n6jg3SGYe hupNGuWrYj7Y38reH+9aSSwr07VxaTTYvCgXICG6hPao1hHt7BEDhVV75cR9CIrH CSIPMF8uShP8U/1by6jFpEHqXggNNKlDz3XVOiLmgU6J02qv/iSxHea4FkxB/KJG ZlztOPILRLOHS+H8RZMtpLyYKV1BdN1Zonm+5mPbs3qLmTBq7gho9S+gIJirB1uW KdpZMzdR/le4RyMNQ8frVO9jaeuR86Q8RoIy04f9B6o33SspvR8y7vpWkLw6l8A= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=yUD9vu T/PayhFyRYW9NkMQ7WnhhgskMYtOj2gsYXFSM=; b=U7JyKDARYkftYRjeXhuGPs AaNMuihwj3C9Vjcqqgj2s5sHLWCIFBXeL5eqDq5VGVLSsUEqbmH+F590qKTusKoc RB8o3K/suQvhvnKloO2ptVF0E2kNIcnGZljXL67ZPp2h39eNgohTeAOeeVXAyiJZ cIsFrDGsIG3p5VLyz9RMVVOKccXcTKL6+12fyMvMm9VefI3Zydy8jfZ0qzLSDFQJ fIa6myfXlTm8VZFD3g+BYaJrESgzJE/JDp9Wh3rB27ZzXTbUHeSjftVnyvU5NJY1 V/yUEEbnsLHSOPP/iuZuY2wpSOVvqSdj+vMkCMXCRPbXrUsBHo7geWB0+Rls3ryQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-BWkXEvNNPrbzjFf3RzsXjqaVfqUf_w8GN8LRxg3I0832eZsmxY9Tg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrtddugdehfeculddtuddrgedutddrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfgg fkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigr nhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomhenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-BWkXP7noeEXe18S6Q02ttJ-NcriO4fA6VmCIYCTvVqSmCwSQlcnGg> <xmx:-BWkXCarVdr0TRWchATZVN7hPfm4VtcOgqOA7nkjWGxEmJjhHrMd6g> <xmx:-BWkXCgZu7N7d0bp821_OozCTJQLH4JLewTGH8rXkP0n4HYu5Fy4JA> <xmx:-BWkXJl31XW6mKLpj1IgyVfpRXrXxHg80j0KS2G1xpnrGv-mX7gAnw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 31F152057A; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 22:10:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-329-gf4aae99-fmstable-20190329v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Me-Personality: 56629417
Message-Id: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 22:09:59 -0400
From: "Bron Gondwana" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=82a61168cf8e4b3a94792da3fa4147fb
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Fwd: Personnel change for extra WG
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 02:10:06 -0000

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019, at 18:58, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> On Friday 29 March 2019 19:44:53 CET, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > In this particular case, there's a pretty good piece of prior 
> > art for the name in RFC5232, plus multiple mentions online.
> Oh, that was easy to misunderstand, wasn't it. Sorry. I didn't mean to say 
> that this particular flag was a bad candidate for standardisation. Rather 
> that we already have two many piecemeal standardisations. If there's 
> another RFC, it should make some attempt to cover most of the flags that 
> ought to be standardised at this point in time.

Yeah, I was more tempted to just do an IANA registration for it.

> > That sounds reasonable. I'd be happy to help with a document 
> > like that, or find someone else at FastMail who might want their 
> > name on an RFC in exchange for doing the work :)
> I can edit, iff two big providers will produce flag lists. Alone or with a 
> co-editor.
> I like the way Neil has used github.

I can do one for FastMail. Anyone from one of the other providers here able to get such a list?

There's a handful of flags which FastMail use internally which may or may not have any interest ourside, so I'll account those separately.


 Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd