Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ?

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Sun, 03 March 2019 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA1C1288BD for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:00:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65S0JRM7jYXV for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (unknown [66.159.242.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D4D5124B0C for <extra@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01R3U0AKARPC000T5U@mauve.mrochek.com> for extra@ietf.org; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 16:55:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1551574523; bh=hU/KCCoMLnhfpIvvCLC1zRynqL3qat+lEvZ+FC1cp0U=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=GLETdUmPtboDEz1hgvM+D+MGCOb5+4kGn7I2s80pcvpkkPYKb0vn856YdnlHT13vu wY1246c9lKBYxDDdgndQ/TIsRqsgi7MKz0mQBhkfaJ/ov0OKOdO8CP5I8vfHoOHeRE 76H8iCbGNv+Z3Vv0Xt8XzQ+PlelCv4AZYlKkckxQ=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii; format=flowed
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01R3MU6TZ3HS00004L@mauve.mrochek.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 16:55:19 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, extra@ietf.org
Message-id: <01R3U0AGMOD200004L@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 16:54:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sun, 03 Mar 2019 07:48:25 +0900" <alpine.OSX.2.21.1903030744250.13550@ary.local>
References: <01R3SIVTJAOS00004L@mauve.mrochek.com> <20190302153532.86AEF200F83ABF@ary.local> <01R3TJO31IL800004L@mauve.mrochek.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1903030744250.13550@ary.local>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/Gh8K6qZdet4DtOt5O2eVRNatwe0>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 01:00:30 -0000

> > How is this validation performed? If the answer is the DKIM signature check,
> > that doesn't address the issue at hand in any way I can see.

> They only show logos on mail that's DMARC aligned, but that just tells us
> that the domain on the From: header really sent the message.

> They're trying to invent third party validation services to attest that
> logos A, B, and C can be used by domains X, Y, and Z, and then explain
> why that will work better than EV certificates.

Uh... Really, I have no words.

				Ned