Re: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05.txt

"Jiankang Yao" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Sat, 29 September 2018 03:38 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E66127AC2; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CnuiweuRu1SX; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1E8126F72; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from healthyao-PC (unknown [218.241.103.187]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0AZIPyh865bFTEbAA--.19766S2; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:38:09 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:38:05 +0800
From: Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc <draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc@ietf.org>
Cc: extra <extra@ietf.org>
Reply-To: yaojk <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
References: <153662523769.16137.7151778749740462039@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.0.1.92[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2018092911370230091886@cnnic.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart077660771763_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0AZIPyh865bFTEbAA--.19766S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxCr15Zry7ur43KryxXw4kXrb_yoW5ur4DpF W3Wry3Kr1rJa1xK3yxXr15ZF1Y9ry3JFWrA3ZxKrykAFW5Aa4ktr1xtwsYvr9rCr93GFWD Zw129w1UW395XrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBjb7Iv0xC_Kw4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26F4UJVW0owAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40E42I2 6xC2a48xMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4I kC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wACY4xI 67k04243AVC20s07MxkIecxEwVAFwVW8GwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7x kEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E 67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCw CI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E 3s1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCE64 xvF2IEb7IF0Fy7YxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07brWlkUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dryyw6fq0xffof0/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/GiWXwA2_MvmzuPgezjMAgL-yO08>
Subject: Re: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05.txt
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:38:24 -0000

Dear authors,

  I am preparing for the shepherd write-up.

  Could you kindly address the following issues and update a new version? Thanks. 

  https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05.txt 


  ** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest one
     being 2 characters in excess of 72.

  -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC5435, but the
     abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.

  -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC5230, but the
     abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.


  Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
     to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

  -- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: '1' on line 524

  == Missing Reference: 'FCC' is mentioned on line 196, but not defined

  -- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: '2' on line 526

  -- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: '3' on line 528

  -- Looks like a reference, but probably isn't: '4' on line 530

  == Unused Reference: 'RFC5321' is defined on line 495, but no explicit
     reference was found in the text

  == Unused Reference: 'RFC5429' is defined on line 499, but no explicit
     reference was found in the text

  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4234 (Obsoleted by RFC 5234)


     Summary: 2 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 4 warnings (==), 9 comments (--).

     Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about
     the items above.








Jiankang Yao

From: internet-drafts
Date: 2018-09-11 08:20
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: extra
Subject: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Sieve Extension: File Carbon Copy (Fcc)
        Authors         : Kenneth Murchison
                          Bron Gondwana
Filename        : draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05.txt
Pages           : 13
Date            : 2018-09-10

Abstract:
   The Sieve Email Filtering Language provides a number of action
   commands, some of which can generate additional messages on behalf of
   the user.  This document defines an extension to such commands to
   allow a copy of any generated message to be filed into a target
   mailbox.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-05


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Extra mailing list
Extra@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra