Re: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-special-use-01.txt

Stephan Bosch <stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi> Sun, 04 March 2018 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D32126BF6 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:41:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-uK5Qg9JlM8 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dovecot.fi (wursti.dovecot.fi [94.237.32.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C811242F7 for <extra@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:41:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.168.3.2] (klara.student.utwente.nl [130.89.162.218]) by mail.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A92252B3CD6 for <extra@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2018 21:41:27 +0200 (EET)
From: Stephan Bosch <stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi>
To: extra@ietf.org
References: <151533655607.10858.793231788332492256@ietfa.amsl.com> <ce56fc8f-366a-8e1e-2f00-1ed22da28d15@dovecot.fi> <01QNLYA7BLVQ000051@mauve.mrochek.com> <d3a952db-a264-9234-dff6-452d38a53d81@dovecot.fi> <01QNNBB3GEW0000051@mauve.mrochek.com> <990a2344-d003-5a05-6b5c-c9d72a259753@dovecot.fi> <8affa07e-7e2f-ef54-fcbd-e450b5636eed@dovecot.fi>
Message-ID: <f0859592-d199-8063-0d73-ae761d7bcd5c@dovecot.fi>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 20:41:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8affa07e-7e2f-ef54-fcbd-e450b5636eed@dovecot.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/HX67Ffgc_0m1mmEkqxR4fE4ZB9k>
Subject: Re: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-special-use-01.txt
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 19:41:30 -0000

Op 2/15/2018 om 11:30 PM schreef Stephan Bosch:
> Op 1/17/2018 om 12:14 AM schreef Stephan Bosch:
>> Hi Ned,
>>
>> Op 1/9/2018 om 10:44 PM schreef Ned Freed:
> Slowly making progress on this one.
>
> I just gave the point below a fresh look:
>
>>>>> The other aspect of the many-many mapping is the fact that a single mailbox can
>>>>> have multiple special use attributes. The draft supports this in the context of
>>>>> specialuse_exists but not in the context of fileinto. I think this is fine, but
>>>>> I want to make sure everyone is happy with this limitation, including the fact
>>>>> that because of this you won't be able to create mailbox with fileinto with
>>>>> multiple special use attributes.
>>>> Good point. For sake of discussion, let's assume we allow a string list
>>>> for the :specialuse parameter. The semantics for creation of a mailbox
>>>> would be quite clear: all of those flags are assigned to the new
>>>> mailbox.
>>> Seems reasonable.
>>>
>>>> But what would that mean for the mailbox lookup? Are we looking
>>>> for a mailbox that has all of these flags, one of these flags or just
>>>> the first flag listed?
>>> The convention elsewhere seems pretty clearly to be for it to be an AND rather
>>> than an OR.
>> I agree.
>>
>>>> Another question is whether mailboxes with several special-use flags are
>>>> really that useful.
>>> Apart from \All, which I would hope is not up to clients to set, I don't see
>>> them as being useful. But I may be missing some use cases, which is why I 
>>> brought it up.
>> Ok.
> Now my question to everyone is: do I need to change anything or is the
> fileinto limitation acceptable?

Opinions anyone?

Regards,

-- 
Stephan Bosch
Senior Developer 


Phone: +49 2761 75252 00  Fax: +49 2761 75252 30
Email: stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open-Xchange AG,  Rollnerstr. 14, 90408 Nuremberg, District Court Nuremberg HRB 24738
Managing Board: Rafael Laguna de la Vera, Carsten Dirks, Michael Knapstein 
Chairman of the Board: Richard Seibt

Dovecot Oy, Lars Sonckin Kaari 10, 02600 Espoo, Finland
Managing Director: Markku Kentta
Chairman of the Board: Timo Sirainen
Board Member: Carsten Dirks

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------