[Extra] 8474

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Tue, 05 January 2021 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E802D3A0CC7 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 06:17:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16FunwOxXBx6 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 06:17:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1CFD3A0C6C for <extra@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 06:17:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A8EC00EF; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:24:33 +0000 (GMT)
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Authentication-Results: stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1609856673; bh=4VXaTujq1PvnV0+9yVpABi4uTfPWmRZrFe7qzjJqVhk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=P2PxE7a0+9pyLoH0Fh6/Ud5syaTEWaZE4YqFFEsK+ru4GoVFhzgf4RZ6nBI0jGPjy wrGSYWlTsNaKOB7K5y9ieOAOkRMmPKZGbPJy6YIOIAg6sqyg6wtuo96bfcyQZy0DA+ DD897VxKdhteeHAGi1KVLwP0uxGC09FTpcxsRCFg=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1609856672-21413-21411/9/8; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 14:24:32 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: extra@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 15:27:09 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <3d8e35d4-f701-45fd-a5a0-553e1cfd2adb@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7; Qt/5.11.3; xcb; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 3 (beowulf)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/JjElF-To38OjAqPHJAa4zmQmiKA>
Subject: [Extra] 8474
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:17:44 -0000

Hi,

8474 suggests that a future extension could add 'x EID FETCH 4782394 
BODY.PEEK…' or perhaps 'x UID FETCH EMAILID 34723894 BODY.PEEK[…'. Why was 
this not done in 8474 itself? There's no rationale in the RFC.

I'm afraid I missed that discussion, my fault, I'm sure.

Arnt