IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-extra-quota-05

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Fri, 27 August 2021 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C667F3A142E; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=rm8UhBrT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=HOwlBoe2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWM-bYQHca6p; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356853A142A; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069065C01EB; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:58:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:58:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:cc:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=O66i cu6SVEqXIP4GkxLdqXrC+WliIYGaxu/CKWzYc9Q=; b=rm8UhBrTfM8Xg39Kqx1S nGpOXMNNbFYjQtTtubY4r+3rhLs0T06JDlJQlx8NBo8Zblad0HN2prwuCS+j1IvQ 1BK6pnB0z001ubgg1iu0Rf5KAv5Jd1d7/rUXM/bKFSSyOyuRXRSMB94d/IQgE2jo qQ9j2xBEi1S3k5eCS8BSRWU48KB0xtVUmjXzPpZGytM3shi8Lz++qXc1lyBdjGh3 u1B1BynM6oYf4roVrgnpWjuwaODc91gDAWHsWxD/719+N+/4nZFgdTksG1Z79HYY Rtd2v3Kpa/dG1JlGi/0WZzM9wzpehp5zE7MQpDakuUgfgYCedGncI1ngVzlspwds Yw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=O66icu 6SVEqXIP4GkxLdqXrC+WliIYGaxu/CKWzYc9Q=; b=HOwlBoe2ZMq2tnUDGdPZuv CmED86Am7HIYzacMd9KgIYuwCjedNgSHL8mXX7d0PSVfVHAtZWxBzTm54MRkSSZO wQo7fdvZ1S3ptTYbONcYSH9OMz2ZmQr1gaf/49beBB1dY3Km9vHpAktz9pxXXxIN hrHEODruonevHoeiddznNLrGhnIpFZerNVC82npeFLTpkd0yC/XsA84DmD9yc1Qz d1sOPXx7Rs9L1Y+WHTCBxkRrj1p8Bd+IfmGyAlVRuF1TKwg8O0urmozaKkQjRTWq KwOupS2b5/dUYXKP93J+QpqXV9YYsNm4m2ij6ak7cENwdRFIYjB4b+Uv8+FLIdIQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YeEoYU47ICEu2QcaalW6HTDVFcMxXI9KsgDumo_9AXXD1yI1udKsNQ> <xme:YeEoYV5w36ccRwsFMXpXL-vbbbfJf8MHyd1MpbFWR-LdC89vCQv43vqM6jwwgKgkj NgGZLy9bWA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddruddufedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtreerreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhho nhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdehteegfeevteduffevteehfffghefhvdevkeeuhfeh ueetudehgfegieekjeetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YeEoYTekH0suYvjo3mytVkek6H6IzACCrxg3SmbcufOqm-sXOQKWNQ> <xmx:YeEoYZLBmcMb9EdLpH10hZf7TbYVyleIc-Smb1RA7HuKBvF0fLyKfA> <xmx:YeEoYYJbPLeoGBdWQ3IXQ0bet5aP6_78B_ASDl4Ci-wJoAyEQeHhCA> <xmx:YuEoYc1tBciFTwwR55ihY39Fg-bBoSVNypMcQTjlHJPyJdOPkL931w>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B029EAC0DD0; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:58:09 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1125-g685cec594c-fm-20210825.001-g685cec59
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <11f3891c-108d-44a8-9478-2ce240ea56e0@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7b89dc9b-3b4f-bbe4-6009-01582229f58a@isode.com>
References: <162938074585.31851.14261488584404618572@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwaZq52=xvq-bc11ijpQQ6+GzJiyQjXSXJXMHMDPP_b+DA@mail.gmail.com> <7b89dc9b-3b4f-bbe4-6009-01582229f58a@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 22:57:49 +1000
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, "Bron Gondwana via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, extra-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=92e7ffe2449945ddbef6fad6942dfdae
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/KaxdbKwV642Y2yOnkMlwc3nOrAg>
Subject: Re: [Extra] =?utf-8?q?Publication_has_been_requested_for_________dra?= =?utf-8?q?ft-ietf-extra-quota-05?=
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:58:20 -0000

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021, at 21:04, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> 
> 
>> I note the comment in the shepherd writeup about the downward reference to something with Experimental status.  Would you like to change the status of that document before processing this one, or did you have something else in mind?
> I don't think any change was intended. Just noting it for the IETF LC.
> 

Yes, that's correct - just noting that there is a downreference and that I don't believe it needs to be resolved.

There is a question of whether we want to revisit per-message annotations, and possibly align them more with RFC5464 metadata.  They are designed on an earlier draft of 5464 (which Cyrus IMAP still supports as well for horrible legacy reasons).

Bron.



--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email