IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 02:44 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A1A126B6D for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=U38pYtfO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=T8g2WLa5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p2NCe9Sz_-J2 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131DE126B6E for <extra@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B7E20A79 for <extra@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:44:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CvPCd6knKM5k+OwKh Fbn//WYw6qpyoDB9VUbTp1oKww=; b=U38pYtfObfQmOqOsACOLGquNXcv50QTTn ft9Qr3RGn7DbsRUj8bgum6GGbU/hSLlOv15qUAg0yR4EjLdr0hgRdiTaQInwFPsA uHmBEmb9ZEy9vMq0qx1xgRW4q9LIz+4R5TuJoXrr/Xh1eAnMMUXXaJgOwFCwrGm/ x40gy0GDxrq/hU7eXMW8f4FNsGtDzbjZF4sOAPq5rvLdU05mlyU8YypjLWWI+Egw GObVPNl/DTox8r4Dw9T3tPp4peeyoQexOaBuKUs68FUuSfHe03Fd/GqMc5N8qbUI DxfMREv0WB3IRBGd4wquIwc3y+JYrM3fOdFQxm2uy7/Nyh7CcFOHA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CvPCd6 knKM5k+OwKhFbn//WYw6qpyoDB9VUbTp1oKww=; b=T8g2WLa5GvZ2chqguolxTM BDatmSGUTzvNtCRS/RXAI4RBq7/RTpB8+gHf3vs0OUrwUau8bIsuZ3oNmLztQU3Y JT9LUrRJfzqHAjqvK9B3ADR0JEflh8/FIYTQo2tO3Uc2yvKdVIcWXItrYU7uKhep wcCiqc4mp972kN7/M33qPT4YDLIpQpVLd/uYPhLysikSeAXVD1kMlVyvnjBSA1ZP PXEQPb7pRPmB0g+JVlzm9qm19pVMfVjvyNT6rv7b2Qkw0LmpMdZ8ec4bLAUCVY20 Z/+ExX5hv6g0oCacXSr1QpVw9YzvNeAJaZ7bhNJ3Ggg2cSah8WE6iUVbqHuADCug ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mW3IWWcoTJ8LdSFRFB8Bg3BZVQwPqs6rJreD7GIHagW1vICU6tD5dw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 36EDA9E2E2; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 22:44:41 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1506307481.2282441.1116892416.35780713@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_150630748122824411"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-64b08692
References: <0871fcf6-f0c5-a4b7-f1e4-7a535d78d776@rename-it.nl> <DA5AEDAF-E697-4116-856C-AED989301055@att.com> <712044986.2363.1505492959243@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:44:41 +1000
In-Reply-To: <712044986.2363.1505492959243@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/MWOztWGH3IMCIqHcZ0qC5FRGkH0>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 02:44:45 -0000

I've created https://github.com/ietfextra/tracking/issues/4 for this


On Sat, 16 Sep 2017, at 02:29, Michael Slusarz wrote:
>> On September 15, 2017 at 10:25 AM "HANSEN, TONY L"
>> <tony@att.com> wrote:>> 
>> 
>> On 9/15/17, 12:07 PM, "Extra on behalf of Stephan Bosch" <extra-
>> bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stephan@rename-it.nl> wrote:>> 
>>   I gave draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit a quick look. I have a few
>>   comments>> 
>> 
>> I too have a couple comments. If it’s called the 64bit extension, why
>> are the numbers limited to 63 bits? Why not the full 64-bit range?>> 
>> I’m sure there’s a good reason (or perhaps not).
> 
> Probably for the same reasons outlined here:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7162#section-3.1
> 
> Although that design decision should be made explicit in the
> text of this> graph (or at least a reference to decision as outlined in 7162).
> 
> michael
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email