IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com> Sat, 12 January 2019 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <murch@fastmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E484F130E96; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:17:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.b=f0u+PYhY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bWWLTv68
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QefAMohkePVX; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BB45130E66; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B951321F4D; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 10:16:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 12 Jan 2019 10:16:59 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; s=fm1; bh=3B3i5bgGpfPuiiNVnq8huq82Isl yPn1MJFbqfJYSAMU=; b=f0u+PYhY0FoEIS8WaVMt/WNP6BI0rLK4uMOSWFqvK+9 oOE0h0vh0bsw9Hd8YOh5V6swBZcxj79iJC+5Bsn/lo0e3NGxVYE3vVO9c0ngQ2/R 96M8ruuxp6YZ+Jf9w93c6mbuV01vpf3iItOF+n1WXs6aeIG6haBbo7bm1Ylk44R4 +DMNXyUjMIErB0n29Ky3VTEHeLTHaN21CgzmIRl5yyIdFhHc7cen0Yp3Yf/55v4t eKi+7/KxKUF9p0r77IkriX+IQoUNDT44FRRICFsRl6DEw7GUvPkcHK32n0HsbHC4 lNQqLN76L571/y4v0szMvlMUnqfuL91xTtETo1Z46vg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3B3i5b gGpfPuiiNVnq8huq82IslyPn1MJFbqfJYSAMU=; b=bWWLTv68DJ/CuY78cvHayP HWwn+YPe3dYbG97URqIN10tR6oi2nwacxY7o4VfQKUd1gP7Tfmx1+Cu6U1Pq4Vcy XYGtyxzBizrtpfsZ5TqqkIFwHRwehNtqjSsQd+EEefZfiADy6vUjEG64AfQfdm3d 7WP2rsWTOxq4MxlLh7EA424/pkNTpd38sQFoBbLpkYhOAySl2zhlmVx/GAz/YUG2 52VIJgtQ0xTcVuNILMTY+hv/FzUWf1LBmuC+ryJTFsg+VZMX6TejlB0xzfa7q9Pi PmpL62WsQ9ZEjAJ0Z1qqQFNo+Q8RtNC2QlbX/AM56ndjWceK4dOhposF6qbRdgFw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6AQ6XLtXXtC-ErwVogpMXsr8gmjEKYubcT343Ki1hiPt5OiUp02NhA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrfeejgdejhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhfhohfkff gfgggjtgesmhdtreertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvnhcuofhurhgthhhishhonhcuoehm uhhrtghhsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecukfhppeejgedrjeejrdekhedrvdehtd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhurhgthhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6AQ6XG5q-k6zduAvab67MwEqc_Z3A51OOORkNQdz0PztE0osAwPSAQ> <xmx:6AQ6XGSjEHAqmrbrnkFwaFUd8Ouf4kcv9HGsLMhF8DUU3XiM98gHPA> <xmx:6AQ6XBuLAX9-y6HFqwPxrN7ufU6SIORCazy9eRAPdx89FEAR8uPl0A> <xmx:6wQ6XHrWwqWoHZRx5ioZYu8sYSXEGh6Vjaq9xeTxBzLnpcNl1zjoRQ>
Received: from localhost.localdomain (cpe-74-77-85-250.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.85.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 92765E44F4; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 10:16:55 -0500 (EST)
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, yaojk@cnnic.cn, draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org
References: <154707068927.5028.9965727374137648132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Ken Murchison <murch@fastmail.com>
Organization: FastMail US LLC
Message-ID: <c61400c1-bf40-d287-0c65-6ddff3fec75d@fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 10:16:55 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <154707068927.5028.9965727374137648132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------97936397C5C6C4129BD8563B"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/P7SSt12hmS-BF3WHnD5yiJaD1CE>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-extra-sieve-fcc-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 15:17:03 -0000

Hi Ben,

Thanks for the review.


On 1/9/19 4:51 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> §1, last paragraph (nit): Should "each action" be "each new action"?
>
> §3.2, construction for FCC-OPTS: There is no extension point among the options,
> which would seem to require any new options update this RFC. Would it be
> reasonable to add one?


The intention is that a new option could be added as such:

FCC-OPTS /= ":foo"


or


FCC-OPTS /= BAR

BAR = ":bar" string


Is this insufficient or simply not clear from the text?


-- 

Ken Murchison
Cyrus Development Team
FastMail US LLC

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email