Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ?
Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Thu, 28 February 2019 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD91E130E7D for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:34:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6h6YA3xTqbEq for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:34:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [144.76.73.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E3C130E85 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 01:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EAEC05E3; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:35:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1551346548; bh=YjJRALqDVNRkJ95EktTSVJM2Z/DY19oRFA0ayljCugc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ns8s54JujE3r9zSCkVcggPmxPy0hVTNCE6i2a1x/FVHWTp24DUUq/gk+nGhXrNZXd qCIYR6ygNjPUz1WTtCiWlwN3+I3O+JaDPiZ5p+gz5OozKzE2LFTSYpMP+CFO0l8LWD PYvIPsM7ahqZd/3+fOQbQaImp1BFLDCDPfrVUpMw=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1551346547-2663-2661/9/149; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:35:47 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: extra@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:33:55 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8ce7f4bf-805d-4fbe-8854-5381a4346b2a@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <20190228015702.5B252200F6CDEE@ary.local>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1902262150050.14048@ary.local> <af25a165-ff24-41d4-810e-b00adf2092d5@beta.fastmail.com> <01R3P86JVOOM00004L@mauve.mrochek.com> <a05121fb-a105-458a-bd69-9d6c289860b2@www.fastmail.com> <20190228015702.5B252200F6CDEE@ary.local>
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7; Qt/5.7.1; xcb; Linux; Devuan GNU/Linux 2.0 (ascii)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/RSA-anNwUp6OAhDjRV4QY8TobMk>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:34:03 -0000
On Thursday 28 February 2019 02:57:01 CET, John Levine wrote: > I had a chat with some of the BIMI people and pointed out that > privileged IMAP flags are unlikely to work well, and in any event, if > you have IMAP clients that can put malicious stuff into your > mailstore, you've got worse problems than what logo appears next to > the phish. You're proposing something more like... x-face meets dkim? Good. If you do it by adding a field to either content-type or content-disposition, a bit like 3676, then it's easy for imap clients to do what gmail does, oops, I meant behave in a user-friendly manner. No new protocol is needed in that case. Arnt
- [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John R. Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Michael Peddemors
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Ned Freed
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Ned Freed
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John R. Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Ned Freed
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Ned Freed
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? John R Levine
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Ned Freed
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Robert Mueller
- Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ? Brandon Long