Re: [Extra] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with COMMENT)

Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> Wed, 23 September 2020 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DB53A0B6D; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sh1Ed5NUCQwS; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5B913A0B6C; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0834D6A25C; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1600830875; bh=PkN0sJKP6KkSyNMizfkwCbHgenWTpBemQpiRx0fpe/0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=Ie1i3Z+TsGJ4T67V4AdMGiHGbLbvtDYvcaMSA3Y6ALvmsmiYk1YLTYuuKWjE2kzV+ 6BhdpZvWocS/uDXB7KN8sZ+LEeLrGiW6QWZlMtNLNdsM39u41TWa0qe94PDGfSzH9U yRypQLZt5VTwoqfUNjttVdApko4HAehz904pAHFy/5N7y6/N9SEWFVO+0iv1CVce5r ulT77GCd/4oPB3qymjLsJq8Jr4+DEvcsl0D/sfZh69q9z+tNikG3KXzW8vkblwmArL /cfXh/HmVoigZJjcPYNEF8Dfp27pbaUZOsSQ7BoPV+5SiTpLCxiYE5b+zDr+479mQx pvLF9WtNNBuKg==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D24613C0361; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:14:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 21:14:34 -0600
From: Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, extra-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview@ietf.org
Message-ID: <120067476.17534.1600830874705@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <160075698787.23651.14411790834126136869@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <160075698787.23651.14411790834126136869@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev8
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/RjfGgOj0EfBw5R9P8BDazc3C3Ms>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 03:14:40 -0000

> On 09/22/2020 12:43 AM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In Section 1, this reads oddly:
> 
>    Using server-generated previews allows global generation once per
>    message, and then cached for the retention period of the source
>    message.
> 
> Perhaps add "they can be" before "cached"?

How about expanding "they" to specifically reference the preview to eliminate ambiguity?

So:

    Using server-generated previews allows global generation once per message,
    and that preview can be cached for the retention period of the source message.

michael